He served in office from Jan. 20th, 1961 to Nov. 22nd, 1963.
Answer:
1. Roman slavery was not based on race so sometimes it was hard to differ if someone was a slave or not (everyone looked similar).
2. Both roles are pretty similar except for the fact that slaves are forced into labor work and freed men work on their own free will and are treated better.
3. Slaves are abused and treated badly and freemen aren't.
4. Slaves were used in all forms of work except for public office.
5. Often times employed men and slaves would work together except that the free employed men would get paid and the slaves wouldn't (this usually happened when one cannot find enough slaves to work and can only conclude to using paid workers so that's when they end up getting mixed together).
The role of slaves and freemen seem very similar in a lot of aspects (despite the fact that slaves cannot work in public office) but they are ranked by their parents (if your parents are slaves then you're born a slave) and slaves can also be chosen out of something like a battle. If they lose they are taken in as slaves. What I'm trying to say is that freedom was not a right but a privilege for people in the Roman Republic. Things like battles were used to justify and confirm superiority over the losers and gave the winners divine right to rule over the losers (slaves) and treat them badly. At a point the slaves were practically invisible.
Explanation:
ik know i already answer this one but can you give brainlist again
Answer:
If I lived in a economy in which production, investment, prices, and incomes are determined centrally by a government it would change my life in a lot of different ways. The first way it would be different is I would be paid differently. That could have drastic consequences on my income and investments. I also might not be able to find all the commodities or goods that you would normally be able to find in a market economy. If for some reason I wanted to buy some luxury items: fancy bed, new expensive clothes and such then the state would say no because those items are not needed to survive. Therefore my life would be different in that way. all in all living in this kind of economy would become very different then my current lifestyle
Explanation:
For the other answerer if you highlight the previous answer with the mouse and then right click it the press copy you can paste it on here using ctrl v
Answer:
"Says Law" is calling out someone or stopping someone from doing something because "the law said so"
The law may not be true because the person may or may not be lying to you.
Dont quote me but i think its
B
C (idk)
E
C
