It is an incomplete question and the complete question is
How does paragraph 4 contribute to the development of the central idea?
A.
It highlights that certain rights are only accessible by people of high social or economic standing.
B.
It emphasizes the shortcomings of our criminal justice system and why people are treated unfairly.
C.
It compares the original wording of the amendments with how we interpret their meaning today.
D.
It details the rights that all people are supposed to have access to regarding criminal justice.
The paragraph 4 gives the details of the rights that all people are supposed to have access to regarding criminal justice.
Explanation:
The informational text The American Criminal System by Rachel Silcnick provides information about the American Justice System. She tells the details of how the criminal justice system of providing justice for its criminals or any shortcomings to the system.
The Paragraph 4 has the details about Amendments 4-8, where it presents the rights of the criminals and how the justice system works for them. This also provides the information for the criminals and how they can avail of the rights and how should it work for their side. It also provides the side of judicial justice system for the criminals, where the other passages contains the rights or workings of the system for the victims.
Answer:
Below:
Explanation:
It engenders a feeling of security. It helps everyone concentrate on doing their best work because they see that everything is under control. In contrast, uncertainty – the opposite of conviction –is perceived by the brain as a threat.
Hope it helps...
It's Muska.... (◠‿◠✿)
Answer:
"Going for the gold"
Explanation:
Gerund is a kind of verbal that works both like a verb and a noun.
It can function as a simple word or as a phrase.Again, phrase is the combination of words that doesn't have a subject or verb but works like a single parts of speech when used in a sentence.
Here"going for the gold"is a gerund phrase as the structure is=verb+ing
And it's a phrase because it doesn't has subject or verb.Rather it's consist of some words supporting the gerund "going"
The most important sign to recognize wether it is gerund or not is the verb following it and the verb "was" is singular.
A gerund always functions like a noun.Such as-
"Walking" is a good exercise.
Here walking has used as noun as it is a name of an exercise.as we know the name of something is considered as a noun.
"Going for the gold" was the team's motto.
In this sentence, "going for the gold"is a single task and it's also the name of the motto the team wanted to accomplish.So it's a Gerund and noun.
(Ask me in comment if u still have problem)
Answer: It emphasizes that fighting the British is the only option left for the colonists.
Explanation:
They have tried reasoning with the British for 10 years, but it is just not working. Also, the previous tries have NOT been successful, so the only other answer we have a B.
