1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
eduard
3 years ago
7

What does Washington mean by the phrase “the spirit of party”?

History
1 answer:
dedylja [7]3 years ago
7 0
What Washington called “the spirit of party” was, he argued, “inseparable from our nature, having its root in the strongest passions of the human mind”—namely, the tribal passion to separate the world into “we” vs. “they,” into rival and competing groups. This spirit can then easily become a desire to see “our side” win, regardless of whether our side is better than “their side” and regardless of the issues at stake or the facts of the matter.
You might be interested in
What were the three primary reasons why Rome fell essay? I chose invasions by barbarians, military problems, and political assas
Bumek [7]

The fall of the empire did fall. The fall of the Roman Empire was caused when there was less loyalty to Rome. The Urban Centers start to collapse. Also the military, political, and Social of Rome was causing Rome to collapse. Another reason of why the Roman Rome collapsed is when the aqueducts were destroyed and some of the public works. Rome is like if one thing falls apart the whole thing falls apart. The aqueduct made Rome collapse because the people of Rome needed water in and out so, when it collapse the population just literally dropped from like a million to a couple of hundred of the people and then the people of Rome just scattered to different areas to have a better life or to move where there is water or good harvests. The metaphor I think of it of Rome falling apart is when there is a grand sand castle, mighty, powerful, and wealthy. But, then the tides get high and wash it away. This is a reference to Rome because Rome was amazing with public works like coliseums, and the beauty, of Rome was demolished, gone, population drops because the ego, the life, the wealth is gone, and that is what I think of it.

The fall of Rome was demolished or destroyed because the economic, political, social, and the military. Rome fell apart because the economic was becoming bad. What I mean by that is that there were poor harvests, instead of rich harvests to feast Rome, and the population disappeared because there’s much less food to eat for maybe your family, or yourself. Rome demolished because the economic was having disruption of trade so, Rome was having hard times to trade and maybe trade for goods like seeds to plant or find new hope to help Rome falling. Rome fell apart when there was disturbance of trade because it was harder to live when the harvest was already pretty bad and the plebeians, and patricians were having revolts that the rich were getting richer, and the poor was getting poorer. Rome fell apart because there was inflation so, the taxes had to go higher and making the poor poorer and the rich richer. That led to revolts and wars that lasted a long time. The drain of silver and Gold was also making Rome fall apart because the Roman ego of Better “than,” was disappearing, and the Roman ego of powerful as disappearing so they got more wars with the other empires, or army’s because Rome was getting weaker. The widening gap between the poor and the rich were increasing causing the Roman Empire to fall too.

The Roman Empire also fell because the political of Rome because Rome kept on having problems like the military was disturbing the politics to help Rome. The Division of the empire made Rome fall because when the Romans tried to make things better by making a east of Rome, and a west, West became terrible by other empires’ capturing the west. That gave the politics a very hard time. The splitting of Roma made Rome smaller, when the Roman empire of the west was conquered. The civil war was another great example that made the Roman Empire fall apart because the politics never got to rest of work. Office also seemed as a burden because whatever they did to make Rome better, there was no reward.

The Roman Empire fell apart because the military, economics things, political, and the Social of Rome. The Roman army made Roma fall because the soldiers needed to get paid to defend or help the people or land of Rome. That caused Rome to get poorer and cause more problems with the politics because they kept on interrupting them. That also gave revolts or increased the gap between the rich and the poor. The Roman army made Rome fall by the army no longer listened to the patriotism or to the Roman people, but to among themselves or the loyalty to the soldiers, and that is a way Rome lost the loyalty to make Rome fall. The army’s of Rome were having problems of recruiting and that to made Rome fall too. The Roman Empire defense fell and the Roman Empire became very weak because the army stopped protecting Rome, but only listened to the other soldiers. So, Rome was invaded or got threats from the Northern European tribes.

The Roman also fell because the social of Rome was becoming less confident of surviving or making Rome able to stand its ground so it won’t fall or be destroyed. There was less confident and that made Rome fall because there was no hope for the empire to stay or not fall. The people of Rome were losing hope because there were revolts with the poor and the rich. The economic was bad by bad harvest and that too made Rome lose hope. They wouldn’t let Rome get bigger because there was food shortage. The social of Rome fell because the Romans attitude that the empire will fall. There lost of hope for the empire brought disloyalty, and corruptions.


4 0
4 years ago
Image the Freedman's Bureau was in the 20-20's. The would use probably use Tweets, Tic Tok and other social media platforms to c
maria [59]

Answer:

1. Life is slow to change, we are now freed from the shackles and bonds of slavery but we are still imprisioned by the unrealistic thinking of our former masters. We work long hours for minimal pay, live in bad conditions, and have little to eat. Obtaining an education and figiting for our rights is difficult.

2. We were offered free land and a mule. but is it enough to support our families. Schools have been started but we need our kids help to work the lands.

3. Our challenges are many, we struggle with making enough money to support our families, we live in the worst conditions and are ridiculed everywhere we go. Our education is lacking and we have no way to better ourselves.

4. Before the war we woke early and worked the fields, we were slaves and had no choice in our lives, we were sold at the will of our masters and often seperated from our families. During the war we struggles to know what to do, many of our masters are serving in the war, we are offered the opportunity to fight for the north but must leave behind our women and children and what will become of them. After the war while on the surface much has changed when you look closer you see that it really has not, many of us continue to work for our former masters for meager pay, we can not support our families and work long hours.

5. The greastest change from the war is we are now free and if we have the means we can seek better opportunities for ourselves.

6. My hopes for the future is to be free of this cycle we are in, working for our former masters, not having an education. My hopes is to truly be free and equal to those around me.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
HELP ME PLEASE AND FAST!!!!
ella [17]

Answer:.

Explanation:

The Gupta Period of India was not characterized by enormous material wealth or by elaborate trade activity. It was defined by creativity. Flourishing arts, fabulous literature, and stupendous scholars are just a few of the things that marked the period. In 185 B.C.E., the Mauryan empire collapsed when the last of the Mauryan kings was assassinated. In its place, small kingdoms arose throughout India. For nearly 500 years, the various states warred with each other. In the northern territories, a new empire arose when a ruler named Chandragupta I ascended the throne in 320 C.E. He revived many principles of Mauryan government and paved the way for his son, Samudragupta, to develop an extensive empire.

5 0
3 years ago
How the Minoan cities and palaces were similar and different from other ancient cities
Elis [28]
I have to think I’ll try to remember
7 0
3 years ago
Read these excerpts from The Way to Rainy Mountain by N. Scott Momaday:
o-na [289]
The first two statements
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which phrase best completes the diagram?
    7·1 answer
  • Following the galveston hurricane of 1900, residents adopted to their environment by?
    12·1 answer
  • The first christian church in Europe was in the city of:
    15·2 answers
  • Why did the Ethiopian pesants reject the Catholicism
    12·1 answer
  • What was one effect of the Silk Road on China?
    9·1 answer
  • How did hoover believe the u.s. should handle the problems of the great depression?
    6·1 answer
  • Which describes the Rust Belt?
    15·2 answers
  • What is the main responsibility of the president and vice president?
    7·1 answer
  • Daytonians had been struggling along for years with an outmoded municipal electric system which had its current generated in the
    11·1 answer
  • Women in the late 1800s organized and marched to gain the right to _?_.
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!