Answer:
Because there is no viable evidence that says other wise. We as humans have only been able to explore about 4% of the universe which means theres still a whole lot that we dont know. If we are able to breath and live on this world whats to say that their arent any living breathing creatures on any other world that we have yet to identife. A good scientist doent cross out any possible outcomes without all of the facts, and the fact is that we dont know enough knowledge to make those accusations.
Explanation:
In Brueghel's painting, the fall of Icarus is happening in the back; no one is even noticing it. Brueghel's painting shows that how a tragedy may not even be noticed by those who are not directly affected by it.
Auden translates Brueghel's painting a little differently, however. To Auden, the fall of Icarus IS being noticed by the plowman and the sailor; Auden says that they are too busy to deal with the disaster and get on with their work. Auden says that Icarus falling is "not an important failure" to them.
Auden's interpretation of the painting is therefore much more negative than Brueghel's initial work.
write it like you are think about it and use a lot of details, hope this helps
Answer: D because one can argue that there are serious dangers to carbon-dioxide.
