Yes , I believe it is
According to Horace Kallen , Cultural pluralism refers to a society that contains a lot of different ethnics, but each ethnics still try to maintain their identity.
The U.S society in 1920s indeed consist of several group with different ethnicity due to the large number of immigrants that came in. But each groups tend to form their own communities in separate area rather than assimilate. This maintain the difference in their ethnic diversity.
Answer:
The answer to this question is given below in the explanation section
Explanation:
In this question, a scenario is given about inferencing information from the given data. The data that is given in the question about the percentage of US Homes with Electricity and it is depicted in the bar-graph as attached to this solution.
In this scenario, Which statement is supported by the information presented in the chart?
People owned fewer electrical appliances in the 1920s than in earlier decades.
More rural homes than urban homes had access to electricity in the 1920s. The number of houses with electricity would decrease after the 1930s.
Demand for electricity increased in the 1920s and 1930s.
The correct answer to this question is 3, that is the demand for electricity increased in the 1920s and 1930s in rural and urban.
Answer:
<h2>im sorry but i dont know.</h2>
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:In historiography, the term historical revisionism identifies the re-interpretation of an historical account.[1] It usually involves challenging the orthodox (established, accepted or traditional) views held by professional scholars about a historical event or time-span or phenomenon, introducing contrary evidence, or reinterpreting the motivations and decisions of the people involved. The revision of the historical record can reflect new discoveries of fact, evidence, and interpretation, which then results in revised history. In dramatic cases, revisionism involves a reversal of older moral judgments.
At a basic level, legitimate historical revisionism is a common and not especially controversial process of developing and refining the writing of histories. Much more controversial is the reversal of moral findings, whereby what mainstream historians had considered (for example) positive forces are depicted as negative. Such revisionism, if challenged (especially in heated terms) by the supporters of the previous view, can become an illegitimate form of historical revisionism known as historical negationism if it involves inappropriate methods such as:
the use of forged documents or implausible distrust of genuine documents
attributing false conclusions to books and sources
manipulating statistical data
deliberately mis-translating texts
This type of historical revisionism can present a re-interpretation of the moral meaning of the historical record.[2] Negationists use the term "revisionism" to portray their efforts as legitimate historical revisionism. This is especially the case when "revisionism" relates to Holocaust denial.
