Answer: $15,500
Explanation:
First we calculate the estimated Uncollecteble debt,
= 6% of 310,000
= 0.06 (310,000)
= $18,600
We will then subtract the existing $3,100 to find out how much we will send to the Bad Debt Expense account because the amount already in the account needs to be included in the $18,600.
= 18,600 - 3,100
= $15,500
We will therefore Debit the Bad Debt Expense account with $15,500 and Credit the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts with the same amount.
If you need any clarification do react or comment.
Answer:
$1,780,000
Explanation:
The computation of the initial cash flow for this building project is shown below:
= Estimated building cost + appraised cost of the lot
= $1,110,000 + $670,000
= $1,780,000
Simply we added the estimated building cost and the appraised cost of the lot so that the initial cash flow amount can come.
All other information which is given is not relevant. Hence, ignored it
Answer:
Bill is probably a(n)
SBU manager.
Explanation:
Bill Wessels, as a strategic business unit (SBU) manager, is responsible for strategic planning, profitability, and performance of his business unit. The SBU is a separate identifiable business unit in an entity with other SBUs. It has a manager, who is largely autonomous in pursuing the business mission of the unit. It manages and accounts for its resource utilization separately from other units. Its performance is evaulated based on set criteria.
Answer:
(B) $20 billion
Explanation:
Given a certain level of MPC, an increase in government spending (G) by a certain amount translates to an increase in aggregate demand (AD) through the relationship below.
where Δ means <em>change.</em>
<em />
Therefore, given ΔAD of $50 billion, and MPC of 0.6,
= 
= 
= ΔG = 50 * 0.4 = 20
Therefore, increase in government purchases = $20 billion.
Same as with Canada which is where both my grandfathers came from. Let's see how many reasons I can come up with just off the top of my head and just for those two.
- They enjoyed the freedom of the First Amendment (speech, press, religion, assembly -- Canada has the same provision) that was not granted in the country they left. They never exercised those rights, I don't think, but their children and grandchildren did.
- They were free to raise their children so that they had the chance of being productive. My father was an MD, but he owed that piece of good fortune to his father. The country from which they came would never have allowed him to get all that education.
- They were able to eventually bring their wives and children with them. There was enough money to be made, even at jobs that didn't pay much, to bring them across the Atlantic.
- They were able, once the families were here, to turn their attention to bettering their conditions. They never became rich, but no one starved either. That's more than could be said about those relatives who didn't do as they did.
- They were free to travel. They didn't do that, but their children and especially their grandchildren did. That too was very limited where they came from.
- They had medical care and good medical care which was not given to just anyone where they came from.
