He starts by telling us about the climb itself, but quickly shifts the focus from the event to Hillary's incomplete account about it. Then, he continues to describe the adventure, stopping from time to time, and referring again to Hillary's view. His narration is interrupted with these occasional comments. Apparently, his goal is to provide a more complete and objective account. The point he draws the reader to is that the climb would have been impossible if it weren't for the two of them, and that it is entirely irrelevant who made the first step.
Drinks like soda or juice that have added sugar to the drink.
Answer: Explanation below.
Explanation:
To correctly answer this question, we would have to read the story. But I will try.
Because we are viewing this story from first person point of view, that gives us Rachel's thoughts. It's like we're her, or we're inside of her. Imagining second person, that wouldn't work because the character BEING talked to can't feel Rachel's feelings. First person point of view puts YOU yourself in the character's place.
Is there some choices to choose from?
