B, because nothing in this talks about dogs, and the main idea of the article is fish. It is more specifically about setting up a fish aquarium.
Answer:
<u>Step 1: Determine which options are correct
</u>
<em>Which scenarios are considered ethically acceptable for journalists? Select three options/
</em>
- Option A: paying money to attend a conference about climate change in order to do research for an article
- Option C: ending an investigation because it may lead to violence and disunity in a local community
- Option D: interviewing the CEOs of two insurance companies that are competing against each other
Option B doesn't make sense because if you are getting paid by a politician, that can further produce bias which can then lead to false things being spoke/written. Option E doesn't make sense because if you use information from a wiki page, that source is not verified which means that the source is unreliable. Therefore, the correct options are A, C, and D.
<u>Look at attachment</u>
Answer:
B
Explanation:
<em>the</em><em> </em><em>paragraph contains</em><em> </em><em>categories</em>
Answer:
3rd option: values
Explanation:
hope this helps
please mark my answer as brainlist