When the debates over the 3/5th Compromise was had, in relation to the above options, the answer is none of the above.
<h3>What happened during the debate for the 3/5h compromise?</h3>
The delegates from the Southern part of the states argued that enslaved people should be treated as people if it came to voting and representation.
They did this to ensure that they would have more representation in Congress even though their population was less than the North.
Find out more on the 3/5th Compromise at brainly.com/question/744051.
It would be that "c. the chairman of the veterans' bureau laundered nearly 200$ million" that was not a scandal associated with the harding administration, since this in fact happened during the previous term.
Except for the king, every noble in a feudal society served as a <u>vassal </u>to a higher noble. The vassal in medieval Europe, was a man who was granted land in exchange for service and loyalty to an older man or is more important. They made a feudal contract that was an exchange of promises between lords and vassals. In feudal society was the monarch, then the powerful lords who had vassals.
This is false. The industrialists Carnegie, Rockefeller, Morgan, and Ford were not known as heroes.
<h3>Who were the industrialists?</h3>
These were the people in the gilded age that were able to amass a great proportion of wealth top themselves. These people were very big business men in the time period that they existed.
They were not seen as heroes, instead the people saw them as monopolists who took the commonwealth and make it theirs.
Read more on industrialists here: brainly.com/question/10230728
#SPJ1
The correct answer is the speaker that would say <span>It's important that the Constitution include a bill of rights.
Anti-federalists were against a strong central federation because they feared that people might abuse it and become tyrannical if given power. This is why anti-federalists supported the inclusion of the bill of rights since they wanted the rights clearly enumerated instead of just implied since implications would be difficult to interpret.</span>
