Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

13

Deal A is at Walmart and they are selling 50 cupcakes for $30 dollars but gives you 10% discount. Deal B is at Costco gives you

50 percent more cupcakes at the same price at $30 of but no discount. which is a better deal.

1 answer:

nadezda [96]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Deal B

Step-by-step explanation:

Deal A : $ 30 *10%=3 dollars

the price for 50 cupcake is 27 dollars (54 cent for one cupcake)

Deal B: 50*50%= 25 more cupcake

75 cupcake for 30 dollars ( 40 cents per cupcake)

Deal B is better than Deal A

You might be interested in

Find the rate of change and initial value. Y=mx+b

tekilochka [14]

Y= 4/5 x + 24
To find the rate of change you find the difference in each of the numbers on the graph. For example, 36-32 is 4. So 28-4 is 24 and that would be the next number down. It would also match x to be 0 because since the rate of change for x was 5, if you subtract 5 from 5 you get 0. So from this we know that the coordinates would be 0,5.
From this info, the slope would be 4/5 and the y intercept or initial value would be 24

4 0

3 years ago

Your friend draws the diagram at the right

polet [3.4K]

Answer:

What he did wrong is that he did not flip all of the points. since S is 1 point up, it would then reflect 1 point down. point P is 3 up and the reflection should be 3 down. Q should be 3 down as well and R is 1 down below the x axis. The Y does not move for all of the points.

Step-by-step explanation:

I hope this helps!

8 0

3 years ago

(11n - 3n) - n<br><br> Help plz desperate

Arlecino [84]

Answer: 7n

Step-by-step explanation:

Because....

First Remove the parentheses (a) = a

= 11n - 3n - n

Then add similar elements: 11n - 3n - n = 7n

= 7n

* Hopefully this helps:) Mark me the brainliest:)!!

~ 234483279c20~

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Please help In geometry homework

bezimeni [28]

The surface area of this hexagonal prism is approximately 313.2cm^2

Hope this helps

7 0

3 years ago

Country Financial, a financial services company, uses surveys of adults age and older to determine if personal financial fitness

Yakvenalex [24]

Complete Question

Country financials, a financial services company, uses surveys of adults age 18 and older to determine if personal financial fitness is changing over time. In February 2012, a sample of 1000 adults showed 410 indicating that their financial security was more that fair. In Feb 2010, a sample of 900 adults showed 315 indicating that their financial security was more than fair.

a

State the hypotheses that can be used to test for a significant difference between the population proportions for the two years.

b

What is the sample proportion indicating that their financial security was more that fair in 2012?In 2010?

c

Conduct the hypothesis test and compute the p-value.At a .05 level of significance what is your conclusion?

Answer:

a

The null hypothesis is $H_o : p_1 = p_2$

The alternative hypothesis is $H_a : p_1 \ne p_2$

b

in 2012 $\r p_1 =0.41$

in 2010 $\r p_2 =0.35$

c

The p-value is $p-value = 0.0072$

The conclusion is

There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of those indicating that financial security is more fair in Feb 2010 is different from the proportion of those indicating that financial security is more fair in Feb 2012.

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

The sample size in 2012 is $n_1 = 1000$

The number that indicated that their finance was more than fail is k = 410

The sample size in 2010 is $n_2 = 900$

The number that indicated that their finance was more than fail is u = 315

The level of significance is $\alpha = 0.05[/ex]The null hypothesis is [tex]H_o : p_1 = p_2$

The alternative hypothesis is $H_a : p_1 \ne p_2$

Generally the sample proportion for 2012 is mathematically represented as

$\r p_1 = \frac{k}{n_1}$

=> $\r p_1 = \frac{410}{1000}$

=> $\r p_1 =0.41$

Generally the sample proportion for 2010 is mathematically represented as

$\r p_2 = \frac{u}{n_2}$

=> $\r p_2 = \frac{315}{900}$

=> $\r p_2 =0.35$

Generally the pooled sample proportion is mathematically represented as

$\r p = \frac{k + u }{n_1 + n_2}$

=> $\r p = \frac{410 + 315 }{1000+ 900}$

=> $\r p = 0.3816$

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

$z = \frac{( \r p_1 - \r p_2 ) - 0}{\sqrt{\r p (1 - \r p ) ( \frac{1}{n_1} +\frac{1}{n_2} )} }$

$z = \frac{( 0.41 -0.35 ) - 0}{\sqrt{0.3816 (1 - 0.3816 ) ( \frac{1}{1000} +\frac{1}{900} )} }$

$z = \frac{( 0.41 -0.35 ) - 0}{\sqrt{0.3816 (1 - 0.3816 ) ( \frac{1}{1000} +\frac{1}{900} )} }$

$z = 2.688$

Generally the p- value is mathematically represented as

$p-value = 2 P(Z >2.688 )$

From the z -table

$P(Z > 2.688) = 0.0036$

So

$p-value = 2 *0.0036$

$p-value = 0.0072$

So from the p-value obtained we see that p-value < $\alpha$ so we reject the null hypothesis

Thus there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of financial security is more fair in Feb 2010 is different from the proportion of financial security is more fair in Feb 2012.

5 0

4 years ago