Answer:
The United States came to power because it led the allied offense in Western Europe against Nazi Germany, and in the Pacific against Imperial Japan.
The war effort also lifted the U.S. out of the Great Depression, and helped the country develop its industry and military even more, at the time that its main competitors were trying to recover from the effects of the war (Germany, France, Britain, Italy, Japan).
The Soviet Union came to power in a similar manner. It led the allied offense against Nazi Germany in Eastern Europe, and it took control of the Eastern European countries. The war also helped the Soviets developed its military and industry, and they had scientific achievements that were on par with those of the United States.
Free unclaimed land and the possibility of discovering gold.
Answer:
Charles Cornwallis led several successful early campaigns during the American Revolution, securing British victories at New York, Brandywine and Camden. In 1781, as second in command to Gen. Henry Clinton, he moved his forces to Virginia, where he was defeated at the Battle of Yorktown.
Explanation:
Answer: A. The size of the empire increased as a result of the trajan's conquests.
Explanation: This is because Trajan conquered the region of Dacia, Nabataean kingdom in Arabia, and more. These places were added to the empire as a result of the size of the empire increasing.
I also did this test question so trust me.
<span>The Interstate Commerce Act was to monitor railroad
operations. During the 1870s a number of countries tested numerous programs
developed to regulate railroad rates and practices, and those subjects were
also repeatedly examined by the Congress. In 1886 the Supreme Court held, in
the Wabash Case, that state governments could not regulate federal shipments
within their borders. In response to that decision, Congress adopted the first
federal program for regulating private business which is the Interstate
Commerce Act. While, the Sherman Antitrust Act, it is an act passed by the U.S.
Congress in 1890 to battle monopoly and inappropriate restraints on
competition. It was also to break up bad trusts that were affecting the
economy. But, it was unsuccessful because there was no clear meaning as to what
a trust or bad trust was. So it was later replaced with the Clayton Antitrust
Act.</span>