Based on the cartoon and historical facts, the following are true:
- a. Prospective Supreme Court Justices.
- b. Attempting to increase his support in the Supreme Court.
- c. The Constitution is in the garbage because the cartoonist believes it is being disregarded.
- d. The main idea is that Roosevelt is going against the Constitution by trying to influence the Supreme Court.
<h3>Roosevelt and the Supreme Court</h3>
- The Supreme Court was striking down some of Roosevelt's New Deal policies.
- Roosevelt wanted to increase the Justices who were sympathetic to him and so wanted to pass a bill to increase the number of Supreme Court Justices.
People believed that if Roosevelt had his way, he would have stuffed the Supreme Court with people loyal to himself which would be a violation of the Constitution as it would reduce the independence of the Judiciary and go against the <em>Separation of Powers principle. </em>
In conclusion, people were against Roosevelt trying to influence the Supreme Court.
Find out more about Roosevelt's attempts at brainly.com/question/20856715.
The consensus that developed at the Convention was that A) a stronger central government was necessary to maintain order and to build the newly formed United States. Many of the delegates believed that a new constitution was needed because the Articles of Confederation were too weak to serve as the governing document of the nation.
Answer: Most free people of color have in Louisiana during the antebellum era had the rights to:
Own, inherit or sell property. Not just land property, they could, buy, sell or inherit slaves, too.
I THINK they could hold rallies and other large gatherings, but I looked that one up just to be sure, and found nothing on it, so it might be wrong, but I could have sworn that they could. The first two are defiantly correct though
Explanation: So, that's A, C and <em><u>maybe</u></em> D
I hope this helps!
There is not definite or concrete evidence that any god exists. God is just a placebo people use to rid themselves of their insecurities. The only "evidence" of god is the bible, however the only "evidence" that the bible is a valid book is that god wrote it. This is called circular logic, it does not work.
The existence of the christian god is most definitely not valid.
Their god is described as omnipotent and omnibenevolent.
Omnipotent = Capable of evil
Omnibenevolent = Not capable of evil
Using this definition to describe someone has the same amount of accuracy as saying that there can be a square circle.
Another contradiction is the myth of free will in the bible. The christian god has apparently given everyone free will, yet he is all-knowing. This means that he knows exactly how you will live your life, moment by moment. This is a contradiction, if he is all-knowing, then you do not have free will.
Overall, there is completely no definite and concrete-evidence that god exists. In fact, it is more probable that he does not exist because he, himself is a paradox.
