The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I think what could have happened to the nation if the Missouri Compromise had not passed was that events, incidents, differences, and debates would have caused the premature beginning of the American Civil War in 1820.
Those years were a time of too much tension. The issue of slavery had already divided the nation.
That moment really illustrated the dichotomy of American society's attitudes about slavery in the early 19th century.
The context of the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was that there were many problems with slavery in the states. Some approved and depended on slavery, others -mostly the Northern states- disapproved and supported desegregation. In 1819, Missouri asked to enter the Union as a slave state, breaking the balance between supporters and non-supporters. By passing the Missouri compromise, the US Congress had an opportunity to soothe the complicated situation. It granted the Missouri request, and at the same time, Main was admitted as a free state.
Answer:
By the fall of 1792, French troops had succeeded in regaining control of most of the island. But the French and the whites in the colony were becoming increasingly divided among themselves about the French Revolution. In France, the king, Louis XVI, was overthrown in August 1792, and a new, more radical assembly, the National Convention, was elected. When this news reached Saint Domingue, it split the white population. The radical revolutionaries in France sent a commissioner, Sonthonax, to take charge of the island, but most whites refused to obey him. Sonthonax began to seek support among the free coloreds, insisting that they should have the same rights as whites. In June 1793, white forces opposed to the Revolution and the granting of rights to people of color tried to seize control of the island’s main city, Cap Français. Outnumbered, Sonthonax made a radical move: he called on the black in surrectionaries to attack the city, promising that slaves who fought on the side of the Revolution would be freed. This allowed him to defeat the whites, although Cap Français was burned down in the fighting. In August 1793, Sonthonax extended his abolition decree to cover the entire slave population.
Althea de Puech Parham, ed., My Odyssey: The first person account of a young white man from France who fought against the slave revolt. He gives some interesting descriptions of the black fighters.
Madison Smartt Bell, All Souls’ Rising and Master of the Crossroads: a novel series by a contemporary American author that gives a dramatic and fairly accurate picture of the Haitian Revolution. Bell plans a third volume carrying the story down to the achievement of Haitian independence in 1804.
Explanation: This may help you if you read it i want to make sure u get it in your own words hope this helped but probably not
An entrepreneur could start his own business.
Is this one of your answers?
Answer:
Constitutional convention in Philadelphia
Explanation:
During the Annapolis convention that was held in Maryland, in 1786, in which twelve delegates came from five states to seek a solution to the fundamental issues concerning lack of interstate economic cooperation. They eventually agreed to the further extensive Constitutional Convention which was later held in 1787 in Philadelphia.
Hence, in this case, the correct answer is "Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia"
The excerpt above is part of the 14th amendment. This amendment was passed in 1868 and was supposed to help protect newly freed slaves. The goal in passing this was to ensure that African-Americans had the same legal rights as white citizens.
This due process clause has been used in several important Supreme Court cases to protect American citizens.
