I believe the answer that it has too much water
After one island has experienced mass extinction of its mainland species, the chances are that the closer and more distant islands will have no consequences when it comes to their equilibrium.
Explanation:
If an island experiences devastating volcanic eruption, and the majority of its mainland species are destroyed, the island will have huge consequences when it comes to its equilibrium number of species. The reason for this is that the equilibrium number of species represents the optimal number of species, or rather the number of species that is capable on surviving on the available resources, not more, not less. With the majority of the mainland species gone, the island will have significantly less species than the equilibrium number of species, so it will take some time in order that number to be achieved.
Because it is an island we are talking about, and mainland species in question, the nearby and more distant islands will not have any consequences on their equilibrium number of species. This is because the species on those islands will not be affected, as they don't have any direct connection with the mainland species of the island in question. Also, the mainland species from the other islands will not be able to migrate in mass numbers toward the island that experienced disaster, but only accidentally and under particular conditions, but still in very small numbers, thus maintain the balance.
Learn more about the Hawaii Islands as volcanic islands brainly.com/question/133577
#learnwithBrainly
The correct answer is - a rise in the total amount of goods and services produced within the borders of a nation.
The economic growth is is defined by the economic activity of the nation, how much is it producing, as well as the quality of the production, of both goods and services within its borders.
If a nation starts to produce more goods, and has where to sell those goods, that automatically, the nation is making bigger profit by having and influx of money in its economy. The same goes for the services, if they are increasing and their quality is becoming better (which is a huge factor for the increase), more and more money will flow into this sector, thus giving it a big economic injection for the nation.
Answer:
<u><em>The 6 !!! benefits of the "General Maritime Treaty" </em></u>
Explanation:
1. Treaty banned piracy in the Persian Gulf, piracy on the coast was virtually eliminated
2. The level of maritime war – in particular against foreign vessels – was dramatically reduced.
3. The treaty banned slavery.
4. The treaty provided for the exchange of envoys so as to make the so-called "friendly Arabs" act together against external forces and refrain from killing people after they gave up their weapons or to take them as slaves.
5. The Treaty prohibits the transport by vessels of slaves "from the coast of Africa or elsewhere."
6. It was part of the UK strategic strategy to ensure that open lines of communication between the British and the Arabs existed. The "friendly Arabs" would be free to trade, leave, and enter British ports
disadvantages of General Maritime Treaty 1820 to the Trucial States
1. Government in Bombay was most dissatisfied with leniency over the coastal tribes and desired, to introduce some conditions of greater stringency
2. The treaty should have for bade the building of coastal fortifications
3. Restricted ship-building and stipulated powers
4. Confiscation as well as empowering British forces to destroy any construction undertaken in the face of the prohibition.
D should be it.
Hope this helps!
