1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
enot [183]
3 years ago
9

How did Roosevelt’s Lend-Lease Act shift US foreign policy away from isolationism?

History
2 answers:
s2008m [1.1K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer

It lent arms to Allied forces and allowed them to pay later.

Explanation

The  Lend-Lease Act was the principal means for providing U.S. military aid to foreign nations during World War II. It was a program provided for military aid to any country whose defense was vital to the security of the United States. The plan thus gave Roosevelt the power to lend arms to Britain with the understanding that, after the war, America would be paid back in kind. Lend-lease was important because it advanced the United States to the edge of war. This was by  providing  that the president could ship weapons, food, or equipment to any country whose struggle against the Axis assisted U.S. defense.The president Roosevelt signed the Lend Lease bill into law in march 11th 1941.

marusya05 [52]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

It lent arms to Allied forces and allowed them to pay later.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What brought about the Japanese and the United States of America fought war in 1941​
Nutka1998 [239]

Answer:

On the morning of December 7, 1941, Japan attacked the US naval base at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. ... The United States declared war on Japan on December 8, 1941. Japan's allies, Germany and Italy, declared war on the United States on December 11. The United States responded in kind, and therefore entered World War II.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Which major contribution did Mohandas Gandhi make to the Indian
soldi70 [24.7K]

Answer:

it's A

Explanation:

Gandhi promoted peace and peaceful solutions, thereby A is correct

hope this helped dude :-)

7 0
2 years ago
What is the main difference between the Justinian code and the natural rights of Thomas Jefferson ?
Helga [31]

Answer:

According to the Justinian Digest, natural law is that which nature has taught all living things: for this right is inherent not only to the human race, but to all animals that are born on land and in the sea, and birds; this includes a union of a man and a woman, which we call marriage; here also the offspring of children, here the upbringing. We see that animals, even wild ones, have knowledge of this right – Justinian stated.

At the same time, according to him, the right of peoples is that which is enjoyed by the peoples of mankind; one can easily understand its difference from natural law: the latter is common for all animals, and the former is only for humans (in their relations) among themselves.

The concept of natural law became common in the 17th century, during the formation of industrial civilization. The major thinkers of this time, and, after them, the enlighteners of the 17th century, called as natural the right to satisfy the basic needs of human, given to every person by nature itself. These natural rights primarily included the right to life and its preservation, to basic necessities of life, to protection from hostile encroachment.

Jefferson lists life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as a natural right. He claimed that all people are created equal.

In Digest, along with the concept of law (jus), the traditional concept of "justice" (justitia) is used, but it is interpreted as "justice" in the spirit of Christian morality. In Jefferson's interpretation of the problems of social equality of people, their inalienable rights to life and freedom, one can see the influence of Locke's ideas of bourgeois liberalism.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Why would southern delegates to the Constitutional Convention have opposed the Three-Fifths Compromise?
Fofino [41]

<em>Answer: Delegates from states where slavery had become rare argued that slaves should be included in taxation, but not in determining representation. ... In the Constitutional Convention, the more important issue was representation in Congress, so the South wanted slaves to count for more than the North did. </em>

<em />

<em />

<em>Explanation:</em>

<em />

7 0
2 years ago
How did the Americans coming from the north add to the difficulties of the British army?
nydimaria [60]

Answer:

I think it's B) by placing cannon on all the mountain tops.

Explanation:

Lemme know if it's right!

I hope this helps u! :D

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What challenges did Chinese immigrants face
    5·1 answer
  • WILL MARK BRAINLIEST
    8·1 answer
  • Why did Spain establish colonies in Texas and California, and what role did missions play in anchoring the Spanish presence?
    8·1 answer
  • Factors responsible for environmental improvements in Eastern Europe during the 1990s included: _____.
    5·1 answer
  • What is the cause and effect of The Black Death
    10·2 answers
  • Which citation style did you learn to use in this course?
    8·2 answers
  • EASY POINTS 50-50
    8·2 answers
  • Why did many women lose interest in politics during the 1920s
    5·2 answers
  • For many Texans, Reconstruction was not over until ___________ and the Radical Republican legislature were no longer in office.
    7·1 answer
  • HOW WAS THE TEXTILE INDUSTRY IN SOUTH CAROLINA SIMILAR TO THE TEXTILE INDUSTRY IN THE REST OF THE UNITED
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!