Both the poems describe the war in different perspectives.
Explanation:
- Muriel Rukeyser expresses her grief about the war and the sad stories which were published in the newspaper every morning. In the end end, she hoped there would be peace and love.
- David Lance Goines uses satire to express his views of horrors of war. It creates a sense of suspense which makes it thrilling. His aggressive arguments give us a sense of the brutality of the war.
- Rukeyser's poem takes a passive approach to reveal the aftermath of war but Goines poem takes a violent approach.
Answer:
A: counter
Explanation:
The other is opposing which means it can't be a claim or logixal fallacy theme. You aren't starting the arguement, but arguing against the arguement. Therefore, you are countering.
Brainliest please?
XxRoadToAcexX