<span>My worst problem is the inability to speak clearly in public. <em>This </em>is not true when I am with my family.</span> The pronoun reference "this" in the sentence is used incorrectly because it used to refer to the whole sentence before it. It implies that the antecedent is "<span>My worst problem is the inability to speak clearly in public."</span> However, the readers don't know which part of that statement "is not true when I am with my family". Is the problem not true? Is the inability to speak clearly in public not true? The antecedent is vague, and we can say that (3) there's no specific antecedent.
It is B because the other answers can’t be it
It would be 1) <span>It is effective support for the claim Hope that helps!
</span>
Answer:
The language in the carbon dioxide article makes the authors sound biased. The article uses negative language to dismiss the opposing point of view. This language includes words such as illogical and misperceptions and phrases such as "prophecies of doom" and "retrogressive policy." The authors also use excessively forceful language to support their conclusion. Some examples include "proven, beyond any doubt," "CO2 is the elixir of life," and "Don't mess with success!".
Explanation:
