<span>In this question, the authorial voice is best described as the voice used by the voice used by authors when seeming to speak for themselves. The historical author is the one writing the text and his or her opinions may or may not be in the text itself; the "author," meanwhile, is the one who the reader perceives to be behind the narration. The fictional narrator is separate from the author and often has a different personality or point of view altogether. </span>
The answer to this question is hidden within the question
itself. How so? Well, first we need to be aware of what
satire is. What is satire? Satire is when an author pokes fun of (almost
mockingly) the element of a government that the author deems a flaw, failure,
or weakness. It doesn’t necessarily need
to be humorous because humor is subjective, and so for every 10 people who find
something funny, there are 10 other people who find the same thing not
funny. As such, satire is best determined
to be scorn. That said, because we know
satire is scorn for the government, the question is almost self answering in
that satire exists within “Top of the Food Chain” because of how he scorns the
government.
"Be not her maid, since she is envious." -> Don't serve her; she's jealous.
"That which we call a rose / By any other name would smell as sweet." -> Names are just labels; they don't mean anything.
"O! that I were a glove upon that hand, / That I might touch that cheek." -> I wish I could touch her face.
"Her eye discourses; I will answer it." -> She speaks with her eyes.
Answer:
Potter and art was taught to the senor classes by Farida.
