Answer:
The correct answer that fills the gap is: Fall.
Explanation:
The paradox of saving or paradox of frugality or paradox of austerity suggests, according to the Keynesian economic aspect, that if all the inhabitants try to save more, that is to say to dedicate to saving a greater percentage of their income, the aggregate demand will fall, the production will fall and the total population savings will be equal or lower.
The explanation of the paradox is because the total income of the population (Y) is equal to the sum of the income of its individuals. Since personal income can be used for consumption or savings, and that consumption forms an essential part of aggregate demand - which finances global income through income and wages - if the percentage of savings increases, logically consumption will decrease , so that aggregate demand will decrease further and, consequently, global income, which will cause personal income to fall. When personal income or income falls, each individual will have to dedicate a greater percentage of their income to save in order to continue saving the same in absolute terms. This will further reduce their consumption (already reduced by the fall in income) so that income will be even more reduced and so on to the point that some or many must use their savings in order to solve the decrease in income.
------
NOTE: If you need to extend the explanation given, you can make a comment or add a new question. I will be very pleased to help you.
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
Since not everyone in a given community would be inclined to pay for a public good, everyone could be made to pay for it through tax.
Answer:
The multiplier is useful in determining the change in GDP resulting from a change in spending
Explanation:
A change in autonomous spending will lead to a much larger final change in real GDP because of the multiplier effect. That spending will have a much larger final impact on real GDP.
Agency costs faced by MNCs may be larger than those faced by purely domestic firms because:
- monitoring of managers located in foreign countries is more difficult AND foreign subsidiary managers raised in different cultures may not follow uniform goals.
- monitoring of managers located in foreign countries is more difficult.
- .MNCs are relatively large.
- foreign subsidiary managers raised in different cultures may not follow uniform goals.
<h3>What are multinational corporations?</h3>
Multinational corporations can be regarded as one that have the license to operates in more than one country at a time.
Agency costs faced by MNCs may be larger than those faced by purely domestic firms due to how foreign subsidiary managers raised in different cultures may not follow uniform goals.
Read more on human capita development here:
https://brainly.in/question/36071285
#SPJ12
Answer:
Got this from the same website you used
Explanation:
Advances in technology like the creation of cheap, lightweight laptops have allowed workers to work from almost anywhere. TRUE.
