Answer:
Taking $1 from Carl and giving it to Andy would increase society's total utility.
Explanation:
Since Andy's income is less than other three people when a $1 taken from Carl would increase Andy's utility more than the loss in utility of Carl. Thats why total utility would increase.
The reason principled negotiation would be the most suitable strategy in international trade negotiation is because it helps a party to leverage his/her principles of the opponent to win the negotiation.
The principled type of negotiation is recognized as an interest-based class of negotiation.
- A principled negotiation is known as a winner-take-all style of negotiation that is focused on a specific goal of winning.
- In a principled type of negotiation, there are no space for consideration of other party’s needs and requirements.
- However, a principled negotiations is limited because it can fail to settle dispute or conflict even if a parties has the highest intentions and negotiating skills.
In conclusion, the reason principled negotiation would be the most suitable strategy in international trade negotiation is because it helps a party to leverage his/her principles of the opponent to win the negotiation.
Read more about principled negotiation
<em>brainly.com/question/6106694</em>
Answer:
$192,500
Explanation:
budgeted net income statement
Net sales $750,000
<u>COGS ($300,000) </u>
Gross profit $450,000
Selling expenses ($83,000)
<u>Adm. expenses ($92,000) </u>
EBIT $275,000
<u>Income taxes ($82,500) </u>
Net income $192,500
Answer: The secondary source on a topic may be biased because the information is translated and the text and information could be altered
Explanation:
Answer: $670,400
Explanation:
Period costs are not included in direct production and in this instance include:
- Variable selling and administrative expense
- Fixed manufacturing overhead
- Fixed selling and administrative expense
Period costs = (12,000 * 4) + 406,400 + 216,000
= $670,400
