1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Wittaler [7]
2 years ago
11

The Abbasid capital was moved from Damascus, Syria, to _____.

History
2 answers:
Citrus2011 [14]2 years ago
8 0
The Abbasid capital was moved from Damascus, Syria to Baghdad, Iraq, during Al-Mansur's rule
Tomtit [17]2 years ago
7 0

The Abbasid Caliphate was the third of the Islamic caliphates to succeed the Islamic prophet, Muhammad. It was established by a dynasty descended from Muhammad's uncle, Abbas ibn Abdul-Muttalib (566–653 CE), from whom the dynasty takes its name.

Under the Abbasid, the caliphate started a new phase. Instead of concentrating, as the Umayyads had done, on the West—on North Africa, the Mediterranean, and southern Europe—the caliphate now turned eastward. The capital was moved from Damascus, Syria to the new city of Baghdad, and events in Persia and Transoxania were closely watched.

You might be interested in
1. Why were the northern Italian city states so wealthy during the Renaissance?
Svetlanka [38]

During the period of the Renaissance, Italy was divided into numerous small city-states controlled by local wealthy people. There were large differences though from one city-state to another, and while the northern ones were very wealthy and had things going very smoothly, the southern ones were much less successful.

The reason why the northern Italian city-states were so wealthy was mostly the trade. These city-states had excellent large ports. They were producing multiple things that were in high demand and also very well paid for for export, and were getting lot of things they needed and desired from the other parts of the world.

These states had very well developed fleets, and they were trading with multiple Asian regions, Europe, as well as parts of Africa. They were exporting their high quality products. Very often they were buying certain things from one place, then re-sell it in other place buy much higher prices, thus getting more and more wealth over time. That wealth enabled them to get all they needed without any problem, thus making them very stable and strong small states.

4 0
3 years ago
How did the spead of nationalism impact Japan during the 18 century
Yanka [14]

Answer:

It started with the "Black Ships" of 1854, when the USA forcibly opened up Japan for trade and westernization.

Explanation:

On the 1st of March 1854, Commodore Matthew Perry opened up Japan for trade by showing them his armada of steel ships which were superior to anything the Japanese had. At the time, the emperor had no real power, it was the Shogun who ruled the country. However, as the country westernized (becoming more like the western countries), Japan eventually had a government with different parties instead.

Ever since 1854, a feeling of nationalism had been growing since the Japanese were forced out of their old ways.

Also because westernization included colonialism, expansionism, capitalism, and nationalism

Nationalism in Japan in the 19th century (1800's) was not a big problem until the 20th century. It was then that the fear of communism created more nationalistic feelings, as well as that certain movements wanted Japan to rule East Asia. This eventually led to the unintentional invasion of China by the Kwantung army that the government had lost control of, which led to the Sino-Japanese war.

6 0
3 years ago
How was Incan history recorded and passed down?
krok68 [10]

Answer:

With about 25,000 miles of highways, the Inca Empire used a complicated road infrastructure that distributed messages and commodities across society.

Explanation:

As the Inca's only written accounts were composed by strangers, its myths and culture were passed down by professional storytellers to successive generations.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the late 19th century, this political and social movement swept through the United States, its followers believing that all p
KiRa [710]

Answer:

In the late 19th century, "Nativism" as a political and social movement swept through the United States. its followers believed that all people who were not born in the U.S. and were of European heritage should be banned from the country.

Explanation:

In the nineteenth century the number of Irish immigrants in the eastern United States grew, and the number of Germans in the Midwest. Irish potato famine and economic instability in Germany caused nearly three million people to reach the United States. Many of these people were Catholic. American Protestants, mainly in urban areas, felt threatened by newcomers. For many, the Catholic Church represented tyranny and subjugation to a foreign power. On a practical level, competition for jobs increased as new workers arrived. As anti-immigrant and anti-Catholic sentiments emerged, nativist groups began to form in cities across the United States.

The best-known nativist movement in the United States emerged in the decades before the Civil War. It was the American Party, better known as Know-Nothings. This movement was a reflection of the difficult times facing society in the nineteenth century. The nation faced the serious conflict over slavery and westward expansion.

This anti-immigrant sentiment in the United States has a history that goes back to the first laws of naturalization. For example, it is important to know that laws were made that established that only those white European immigrants were eligible for naturalization. The nativists of the <em>Know-Nothings</em> movement opposed the entry of German and Irish immigrants in the mid-19th century. In 1882, Congress passed the Chinese Exclusion Law prohibiting Chinese immigration to the United States.

4 0
3 years ago
HELP PLS ASAP I PUT TONS OF POINTS AND WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST IF UR RIGHT
mina [271]

Answer:

Animals should be given a share based on the work they do. The farm should be socialist.

Explanation:

The speaker explains how the animals are not given the proper amount of reward for the work they do, saying how "(the animals) tills the soil, and yet there is not one of (the animals) that owns more than (that animal's) bare skin." This quote supports that statement because it talk about how the animals do not a fair share of food or some sort of reward based on all the work that they do.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What new role did Pope Urban II introduce for the Catholic Church?
    7·1 answer
  • After the final crusades were over, what city in the Holy Land had Christians managed to hold onto?
    8·1 answer
  • What year was ethics created?
    8·1 answer
  • 76 points
    7·1 answer
  • Rome has a very small army<br><br> True<br> False
    5·1 answer
  • The Marshall Plan was designed to stop the spread of communism by providing?
    15·1 answer
  • The , Ukraine, nuclear power station suffered a complete meltdown in 1986.
    15·1 answer
  • Who gave Oglethorpe permission to build a settlement on Yamacraw Bluff?
    14·1 answer
  • Which county government system most resembles the structure of the federal government?
    5·2 answers
  • Help pls American history
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!