1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kupik [55]
4 years ago
14

Help ASAP GIVING A GOOD AMOUNT OF POINTS FOR THE CORRECT ANSWER

History
1 answer:
7nadin3 [17]4 years ago
8 0

The New Frontier & Great Society were extremely successful in building up the US's infrastructure, scientific technology, and other aspects of the U.S. Each program has been able to benefit the U.S. public one way or another.

<u>Great Society Program</u>:

The GSP was extremely successful in conserving nature, building up the U.S's infrastructures, providing national healthcare & benefits, and pouring resources into the U.S. education system. Examples of these benefits can be found in the programs passed, including the Medicaid (1965), which provided  healthcare benefits to lower income families. Medicaid (& later Medicare), is still being used up until recently, and bits and parts are still used in today's world. Allowing for cheaper and beneficial medicare for the average allows for the freeing up of funds to be spent somewhere else. Another act that was aimed more towards building up the lower-income bracket families is the Higher-Education Act (1965), which allowed for scholarships and loans to lower-income households to be able to send their children (or to go to college themselves). The aim for this act is that with higher education & a degree, citizens of the U.S. is able to get/fill in higher-paying jobs, which in turn raise the U.S. GDP Index as a whole. Finally, Project Head-Start (1965), was aimed at helping the US GDP grow from an early age. Remember, higher educational level usually led to degrees, which in turn led to more people being able to fill in higher-paying jobs, which would in turn affect the GDP as a whole for the better.

All of these are aimed to help improve the internal conditions of the U.S. as a whole.

<u>New Frontier:</u>

The New Frontier was created by the Kennedy Administration, and was aimed at building up internal conditions & foreign relations. For example, the Peace Corps (1961), was created to send US citizens abroad to help under-developed countries (3rd world countries) to transition for the better. It was also a more peaceful way to bring countries into the U.S. sphere of influence & under democracy. With the creation of the Peace Corps, however, Kennedy saw the need to increase spending on the military, augumenting the funding of the military to allow for research for new military hardware and implementation funding for such. Like Johnson after him, he worked to help improve the U.S.'s economy, and created bills that helped the poor & less-fortunate people. He also created N.A.S.A, which led in the US in Space Exploration, discovering not only new information about the world outside, but also landing the first man on the moon. Later on the ISS was created, which brought the world together to explore the universe together.

Unlike the GSP, the NF was created to help improve external relations with other countries, in hopes of, at first, staving off the spread of communism, and later on, to open up the U.S. for cordial relations with Communist nations.

Both were fairly, if not, really successful in meeting the objectives that they have set. However, that is not to say that there may not be more improvements, but as for what they knew, and the conditions they lived in during that time, I believe that they did their best to make the world not only a better place to live in, but also worked to help expand our knowledge of the world and her surroundings.

~

~

You might be interested in
What are their reasons for not wanting to go to war
barxatty [35]
Economy crash and hunger
5 0
3 years ago
The United States began fighting in World War II immediately after which event?
devlian [24]
Attack on Pearl Harbor
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help help help help
Naddik [55]

That perfect picture of the American Dream: A white picket fence, 2.5 kids, a dog and friendly neighbors — they all require a suburban location.

But according to one new book, that picture is changing. Americans are leaving the suburbs. In fact, for the first time a century, cities are growing faster than the ‘burbs. Leigh Gallagher, assistant managing editor at Fortune, looks into why in her new book “The End of the Suburbs: Where The American Dream is Moving.”

And while many people think of the growth of the suburbs as an explosion of American independence, the buildup of places like Levittown were actually quite planned by the government — especially with the help of things like tax deductions.

She attributes part of the change not to a sudden desire to live like Manhattanites, but instead a desire for more community.

“It’s not just about moving back to the city, it’s not like everyone wants to live in a New York City skyscraper,” said Gallagher. “People want to be in communities that are livelier, where they can get to know their neighbors more.”

Part of the change is also attributed to the “huge demographic bombshell” of young families who are choosing to stay in cities with children — whereas the suburbs are full of older generation, baby boomers.

Throughout the writing process, Gallagher even got sick of talking about the topic, which she found inspires so much debate and passion in people.

“So many people grew up in the suburbs, it’s where most people in this country live. It strikes a chord with everyone,” she adds.

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following classes grew as a result of global trade routes?
DedPeter [7]

Answer: Merchants

Explanation:

Clergy are the people who work in the Church so that's false.

Royalty didn't need to grow from trade they were already royal.

and Common people didn't grow from it.

So that leaves - Merchants

5 0
4 years ago
Read the following passage, “The Ordeal of Herbert Hoover.” Then answer the question.
Stolb23 [73]

Answer:

<h3>D.  It was a mistake to shy away from being an emotional leader.</h3>

Explanation:

  • President Hoover became the president at a time of National Emergency. His policies and approaches to tackling the Great Depression was seen as a failure by many Americans and he has been dubbed as “Hoovervilles”, “Hoover hogs”, “Hoover flags”, etc because he was blamed for the failure of the administration.
  • The above statement best reflects the argument that President Hoover's shying away from the emotional aspects of modern, mass leadership was a mistake.
  • It is believed that President Hoover's failure to acknowledge his weakness and emotional aspects greatly affected his reputation as a politician.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why do men have the need to kill, the need for power, and the love of hatred?
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following nations joined Germany and Austria-Hungary after World War I began?
    13·2 answers
  • Even though few Georgians participated in the French and Indian War, how did Georgia benefit from the British victory over the F
    13·2 answers
  • Which book written by Thomas Aquinas used reason, logic, and Aristotle’s ideas to argue that God existed?
    6·1 answer
  • If you are in southamerica and you want to go to the united states in which direction would you travel
    8·1 answer
  • Question 4 (1 point)<br> What is the first written form of government in the U.SI
    12·1 answer
  • please answer the questions. I'll be giving brainiest. Who would you vote for and why? What do you think will happen after this
    9·1 answer
  • Kansas/Nebraska Act
    13·1 answer
  • French and Indian war: how did the event impact the colonies?
    14·1 answer
  • Please help me
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!