1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kupik [55]
4 years ago
14

Help ASAP GIVING A GOOD AMOUNT OF POINTS FOR THE CORRECT ANSWER

History
1 answer:
7nadin3 [17]4 years ago
8 0

The New Frontier & Great Society were extremely successful in building up the US's infrastructure, scientific technology, and other aspects of the U.S. Each program has been able to benefit the U.S. public one way or another.

<u>Great Society Program</u>:

The GSP was extremely successful in conserving nature, building up the U.S's infrastructures, providing national healthcare & benefits, and pouring resources into the U.S. education system. Examples of these benefits can be found in the programs passed, including the Medicaid (1965), which provided  healthcare benefits to lower income families. Medicaid (& later Medicare), is still being used up until recently, and bits and parts are still used in today's world. Allowing for cheaper and beneficial medicare for the average allows for the freeing up of funds to be spent somewhere else. Another act that was aimed more towards building up the lower-income bracket families is the Higher-Education Act (1965), which allowed for scholarships and loans to lower-income households to be able to send their children (or to go to college themselves). The aim for this act is that with higher education & a degree, citizens of the U.S. is able to get/fill in higher-paying jobs, which in turn raise the U.S. GDP Index as a whole. Finally, Project Head-Start (1965), was aimed at helping the US GDP grow from an early age. Remember, higher educational level usually led to degrees, which in turn led to more people being able to fill in higher-paying jobs, which would in turn affect the GDP as a whole for the better.

All of these are aimed to help improve the internal conditions of the U.S. as a whole.

<u>New Frontier:</u>

The New Frontier was created by the Kennedy Administration, and was aimed at building up internal conditions & foreign relations. For example, the Peace Corps (1961), was created to send US citizens abroad to help under-developed countries (3rd world countries) to transition for the better. It was also a more peaceful way to bring countries into the U.S. sphere of influence & under democracy. With the creation of the Peace Corps, however, Kennedy saw the need to increase spending on the military, augumenting the funding of the military to allow for research for new military hardware and implementation funding for such. Like Johnson after him, he worked to help improve the U.S.'s economy, and created bills that helped the poor & less-fortunate people. He also created N.A.S.A, which led in the US in Space Exploration, discovering not only new information about the world outside, but also landing the first man on the moon. Later on the ISS was created, which brought the world together to explore the universe together.

Unlike the GSP, the NF was created to help improve external relations with other countries, in hopes of, at first, staving off the spread of communism, and later on, to open up the U.S. for cordial relations with Communist nations.

Both were fairly, if not, really successful in meeting the objectives that they have set. However, that is not to say that there may not be more improvements, but as for what they knew, and the conditions they lived in during that time, I believe that they did their best to make the world not only a better place to live in, but also worked to help expand our knowledge of the world and her surroundings.

~

~

You might be interested in
We should raise taxes on the richest Americans to pay for the things our country needs.
ki77a [65]

This is something where the answer will depend on which side you pick. So you have a choice on what to do. Here are two viewpoints.

---------------

In favor:

I agree that we should raise taxes on the wealthiest people in the country because they can afford to pay them. Their lifestyle won't be affected too much compared to someone who is struggling to put food on the table, pay rent, or pay for health insurance. Wealthy Americans take advantage of various infrastructure everyday and possibly don't realize it, so it makes sense to have them pay their fair share. With the wealthy contributing more, it gives the lower class workers a more fair share to get a better foot hold and have a higher standard of living. The more people with a higher standard of living, the better the country off is as a whole.

---------------

Against:

I don't agree that we should raise taxes on wealthy Americans. Higher taxes discourages people from earning money since those in a higher tax bracket are going to pay a higher rate. This unintended consequence pushes people to stay in a lower bracket and not earn their full potential. Also, higher taxes chases people away to lower/no tax locations. In a sense, it's like pursuing the path of least resistance. Even if the tax money was collected, it is likely to be spent in places where it shouldn't possibly due to corruption or incompetence.

---------------

Of course these are just basic outlines to help you get started when it comes to writing your response. Feel free to add or take away anything that fits your style.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How is water distributed through the biosphere
Dennis_Churaev [7]

Answer:

Water is distributed in a cycle called the water.

8 0
3 years ago
Which is the common aspect of the religions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam? A) monotheism B) reincarnation C) belief in the
Westkost [7]
The correct answer is A (a belief in one God)
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How was england's relationship with russia during 1920?
e-lub [12.9K]
I dont quite understand what you mean... Butttt they were allies and russias businesses and tycoons developed srtongs financial ties with the UK.

If this helped you please leave a Thanks! Its greatly appreciated and lets me know im helping :)
4 0
3 years ago
The Roman Province of Britain today is known as ..
kaheart [24]

Answer:

d....................................

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What famous speech did fdr propose the lend lease act?
    6·1 answer
  • In what ways did akbar defend religious freedom during his reign
    15·1 answer
  • Why did European merchants eventually seek a sea route to Asia? A.European merchants were allowed to bring back only a small amo
    8·2 answers
  • What was the tax of 1791 supposed to do
    14·1 answer
  • Which immigrant group faced the greatest degree of discrimination in the united states, to the extent that their immigration to
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following types of missiles are carried by Trident and Poseidon naval vessels?
    9·1 answer
  • Which issue was at the heart of New York Times v. United States?
    12·2 answers
  • What did Charles Darwin study?
    7·1 answer
  • What superhuman powers do the gods have?
    9·2 answers
  • The african colony of palmaes was located in which country
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!