After watching this year's presidential debates, I would say I knew less about the candidates than I knew beforehand. What I saw made me suspect the entire process, "How can we in modern society get along if the two men competing for the most distinguished position of power in the world can't even be civil toward each other." I hope that in future debates, especially the presidential debates, we can find a way to communicate more civilly to strive towards a greater tomorrow.
Answer:
segregation in the north was de factowhile while segregation in the southwas de jure. Hope this helps!!
Explanation:
Answer:
Stalin joined its governing Politburo. Serving in the Russian Civil War before overseeing the Soviet Union's establishment in 1922, Stalin got leadership over the country after Lenin's death (1924). Under Stalin's, "Socialism in One Country" became a central tenet of the party's dogma.
1. I choose the Emancipation proclamation.
The basis for a democratic country is the guarantee of human rights for all of its citizens and allowing all citizens the right to participate in the government.
Freeing other humans from slavery indicates his will to truly bring equality for all people int he nations, because he knew that slavery robbed the very essence of human rights from the people together with their dignity.
2. I compared it with Habeas Corpus
Habeas Corpus allow prisoners to report unlawful treatment when they're in their sentence. Indeed this represent Lincoln' willingness to preserve human rights, but the impact is nowhere near the Emancipation of Slavery that affect millions of human beings.
3. I belive Barrack Obama would be a good example.
Despite his blunder in adressing several economic issues in united states, General population believe that Obama always tried his best in perserving human rights and democracy. (could be seen by programs such as HAPA that give the right for children that born in united states by non-citizzens the right to be a legal citizen)
Answer:
The Articles of Confederation
