<h2>
Answer & Explanation:</h2>
If this is your question, then the correct answer follows:
Read the following excerpt from a group discussion:
Susan: I believe that all elected officials should be required to obtain a 4-year degree from a major university because the amount of legal paperwork they have to read.
Jimmy: Are you saying that only people with a 4-year degree can read higher-level information?
Susan: typically yes.
Susan: I won. Of course I would win, I always win!
Jimmy: But wait, I wasn’t finished. I disagree with the idea that politicians needing to have a certain educational degree.
Susan: Oh my, look at the other team! They are a wreck.
Jimmy: I was explaining that although we agree that elected officials should be able to read at a higher level, we disagree on the law that requires a certain level of education.
Susan: Ok sure, whatever.
Within this discussion, who is the better discussion participant and explain why the other candidate did NOT meet the expectations of a group discussion.
Jimmy is a better participant in the discussion. Not only does Susan cut Jimmy off, but she is rude to the other team. Both are unacceptable in a group discussion, Jimmy maintained a professional, polite manner the whole way through, even when he was put under pressure by Susan's rudeness.
