Answer:
Simon Bolivar surely would have responded to Moriel's capitalism as "a sweeping monster" that is destroying the entire natural environment and peace itself.
Explanation:
It should be noted that the opinions of the different authors on this topic are respectable; But what is logical and convincing is that no form of government or communist, socialist or capitalist has managed to end inequality, poverty and the diseases that afflict and condemn the lives of many people.
Answer:
Not well as they remained the only countries in Europe where feudal system still existed.
Explanation:
- Ottoman Empire started declining in 17th Century. Sultans didn't realized that certain reforms are necessary to strengthen the country. Some of them were done in 19th Century, but it wasn't enough. Industrialization hasn't spread.
- Case in Russia was even worse.
- Absolute monarchs in Russia didn't allowed any changes. There was no industrialization, no constitution. The reforms are done just in 1905.
Answer:
O Their archers struggled to fight the Greek infantry at close range.
Explanation:
I hope it is :) XD
The reason these men and even women held these opinions was that Susan and her followers were fighting for the equality and suffrage of women all over the world.
<h3>What was Susan B. Anthony's fight?</h3>
Susan was involved in the fight to end the inequality that existed in society between men and women.
She was fighting to ensure that men and women were paid the same for the same jobs that they did.
She was an advocate for abolition. At a time when some women felt that men should be the leaders in all things, she stood her ground to ensure that women had the right to vote, right to equal pay, and equal chances to work.
Read more on Susan B. Anthony here: brainly.com/question/14130938
#SPJ1
