1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
katen-ka-za [31]
4 years ago
12

What is the sum of the arithmetic series below?

Mathematics
1 answer:
Nesterboy [21]4 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Option A, 0

Step-by-step explanation:

-105 +-100 + -95 + -90 +-85 + ... + -5 + 0 + 5+ ... + 85+ 90 +95 + 100 + 105

The answer is 0 because there is the same amount of negative numbers as there is positive.  Therefore, the answer is Option A, 0

You might be interested in
Find the x-intercept:
egoroff_w [7]

Answer:

64

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If a round plate has a radius of 6 inches, what is the area of the plate
weeeeeb [17]
113.04 about-ish I used 3.14 for pi
7 0
3 years ago
5/8 x 3<br><br> Btw its not improper<br><br> PLS GOD WHAT IS IT
Elina [12.6K]

Answer: 1.875 I am pretty sure that is it

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Linear Algebra question! Please help!
kozerog [31]

Answers:

  1. false
  2. false
  3. true
  4. false
  5. True

==================================================

Explanation:

Problem 1

This is false because the A and B should swap places. It should be (AB)^{-1} = B^{-1}A^{-1}.

The short proof is to multiply AB with its inverse (AB)^{-1}  and we get: (AB)*(AB)^{-1} = (AB)*(B^{-1}A^{-1}) = A(B*B^{-1})*A^{-1} = A*A^{-1} = I

The fact we get the identity matrix proves that we have the proper order at this point. The swap happens so that B matches up its corresponding inverse B^{-1} and the two cancel each other out.

Keep in mind matrix multiplication is <u>not</u> commutative. So AB is not the same as BA.

-------------------------

Problem 2

This statement is true if and only if AB = BA

(A+B)^2 = (A+B)(A+B)

(A+B)^2 = A(A+B) + B(A+B)

(A+B)^2 = A^2 + AB + BA + B^2

(A+B)^2 = A^2 + 2AB + B^2 ... only works if AB = BA

However, in most general settings, matrix multiplication is <u>not</u> commutative. The order is important when multiplying most two matrices. Only for special circumstances is when AB = BA going to happen. In general,  AB = BA is false which is why statement two breaks down and is false in general.

-------------------------

Problem 3

This statement is true.

If A and B are invertible, then so is AB.

This is because both A^{-1} and B^{-1} are known to exist (otherwise A and B wouldn't be invertible) and we can use the rule mentioned in problem 1. Make sure to swap the terms of course.

Or you can use a determinant argument to prove the claim

det(A*B) = det(A)*det(B)

Since A and B are invertible, their determinants det(A) and det(B) are nonzero which makes the right hand side nonzero. Therefore det(A*B) is nonzero and AB has an inverse.

So if we have two invertible matrices, then their product is also invertible. This idea can be scaled up to include things like A^4*B^3 being also invertible.

If you wanted, you can carefully go through it like this:

  1. If A and B are invertible, then so is AB
  2. If A and AB are invertible, then so is A*AB = A^2B
  3. If A and A^2B are invertible, then so is A*A^2B = A^3B

and so on until you build up to A^4*B^3. Therefore, we can conclude that A^m*B^n is also invertible. Be careful about the order of multiplying the matrices. Something like A*AB is different from AB*A, the first of which is useful while the second is not.

So this is why statement 3 is true.

-------------------------

Problem 4

This is false. Possibly a quick counter-example is to consider these two matrices

A = \begin{bmatrix}1 & 0\\0 & 1\end{bmatrix} \text{ and } B = \begin{bmatrix}-1 & 0\\0 & -1\end{bmatrix}

both of which are invertible since their determinant is nonzero (recall the determinant of a diagonal matrix is simply the product along the diagonal entries). So it's not too hard to show that the determinant of each is 1, and each matrix shown is invertible.

However, adding those two mentioned matrices gets us the 2x2 zero matrix, which is a matrix of nothing but zeros. Clearly the zero matrix has determinant zero and is therefore not invertible.

There are some cases when A+B may be invertible, but it's not true in general.

-------------------------

Problem 5

This is true because each A pairs up with an A^{-1} to cancel out (similar what happened with problem 1). For more info, check out the concept of diagonalization.

5 0
2 years ago
45 is what percent of 150
inn [45]

Divide 45 by 150 then multiply by 100:

45 / 150 = 0.3

0.3 x 100 = 30%

The answer is 30%

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 2+2(2×3)<br><img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%282%20%5Ctimes%205%29%20-%20%285%20%5Ctimes%206%29%20%2B%20%284%20%5Ctimes%208%29
    10·1 answer
  • Describe or show two ways to find the following product: 1 1/3x 2.
    12·2 answers
  • Y=1/2x what are the coordinates PLEASE HELP !!!!!!!
    9·2 answers
  • 5 1/3 - 4 7/8 please help me answer this mixed number :)
    9·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP ME ASAP<br> Find the area. Be sure to write the formula, work and answer with units.
    7·2 answers
  • What is the approximate circumference of the circle? Use 22/7 for pi. Round to the nearest hundredth.
    14·1 answer
  • What is the solution set for -2n – 2 &gt; 2?
    15·1 answer
  • 8 1/3 X 4/6 = <br> Expectations:<br> -Work is shown
    13·1 answer
  • Funke gets #2.50 as pocket money. She spends 75 k and saves the rest. What is the ratio of her savings to the amount she spends?
    9·1 answer
  • Renata moved to her new home a few years ago. Back then, the young oak tree in her back yard was 190 centimeters tall. She measu
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!