Answer:
<h3>A decade has passed since the struggle of the Indian subcontinent to free itself from British imperial rule was crowned with success. For half a century or more before emancipation, nationalists of both the great religious communities had stridently asserted that communal antipathy was illusory - a mere creation of the British Raj, allegedly following the old Roman maxim of "divide and rule.</h3>
Explanation:
<h2>follow me</h2>
The One Ford technique executed by Mulally will be aggressive all inclusive. The national and territorial contrasts won't go unnoticed, in any case, the advantage will comprise of an extensive variety of items that will have similar parts and sub-congregations that can be tweaked and afterward collected to make items particular to an area and additionally a country. Current organizations, that are globalized and make items to meet particular client needs, have discovered that Assemble to Order/Configure to Order has been the best system to help with bringing down cost and making an extensive variety of items.
I don't know five but I know that free-trade, democracy, and open agreements were 3 of them.
Answer:Barack Obama was describing to me the manner in which the Mongol emperor and war-crimes innovator Genghis Khan would besiege a town. “They gave you two choices,” he said. “‘If you open the gates, we’ll just kill you quickly and take your women and enslave your children, but we won’t slaughter them. But if you hold out, then we’ll slowly boil you in oil and peel off your skin.’”
This was not meant to be commentary on the Trump presidency—not directly, at least. In any case, Obama has more respect for Genghis Khan than he has for Donald Trump. He raised the subject of Genghis Khan in order to make a specific, extremely Obama-like point: If you think today’s world is grim, simply cast your mind back 800 years to the steppes of Central Asia. “Compare the degree of brutality and venality and corruption and just sheer folly that you see across human history with how things are now,” he said. “It’s not even close.”
Explanation:
Natural resources that helped South Carolina to prosper were deer and animals that could be hunted for its skins, pine forests to harvest, fertile land for planting crops, a mild climate- not too hot and not too cold, a great port at Charleston, navigable waterways made transportation easy.
