1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zepler [3.9K]
3 years ago
14

What evidence is there for the argument that the progressives' successful breach into the u.s. supreme court's "liberty of contr

act" doctrine came at significant cost?
History
1 answer:
Mashcka [7]3 years ago
7 0

The argument where it states that [the progressives’ successful breach into the U.S. Supreme Court’s “liberty of contract” doctrine came at significant cost] can be witnessed during 1917, wherein during that time, thirty states had limited the working hours of female workers.

You might be interested in
when genghis khan married his wife borte, his in-laws gave him a beautiful sable coat as a wedding present. why would genghis kh
Wewaii [24]

He needed to form alliances with other tribes in order to help his family survive. Option A

This is further explained below.

<h3>What is  Roman Empire?</h3>

Generally, It is safe to say that the Roman Empire was largely polytheistic, with its people acknowledging and worshipping a wide variety of deities.

In conclusion, Romans worshiped several gods despite the prevalence of monotheistic faiths like Judaism and early Christianity throughout the empire.

Read more about Roman Empire

brainly.com/question/11415671

#SPJ1

CQ

When Genghis Khan married his wife Borte, his in-laws gave him a beautiful sable coat as a wedding present. Why would Genghis Khan immediately give the coat away to the leader of a neighboring tribe?

He needed to form alliances with other tribes in order to help his family survive.

He owed money to the other tribe's leader, and the coat was valuable to enough to pay his debt.

He had no use for a coat of this type, given Mongolia's mild climate.

He did not want his wife to have the coat and he feared she might try to claim it.

3 0
1 year ago
What was the triggering event for the united states to join world war 1?.
Sophie [7]

Answer:

Germany's resumption of submarine attacks on passenger and merchant ships in 1917 became the primary motivation behind Wilson's decision to lead the United States into World War I.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Which of the following BEST summarizes the overall disagreement between the federalist and anti-federalists?
ivolga24 [154]

You didn't provide us with choices, so I'll simply provide some historical explanation.  The main issue was whether the Constitution needed a Bill of Rights added.

The Articles of Confederation, in place prior to the ratification of the Constitution of the United States of America, had granted stronger authority to the states.  Patrick Henry and other Anti-Federalists were concerned about too much power winding up in the hands of the federal government and its executive branch, thus allowing a small number of national elites to control the affairs of the USA.  They feared this also would diminish the rights and freedoms of individual citizens.

Federalists believed the Constitution itself clearly limited government power and protected the rights of the people.  Nevertheless, the addition of a Bill of Rights, laid out in the first ten amendments to the Constitution, provided  reassurance to Anti-Federalists in the fight over ratification.  The compromise which led to agreement in regard to ratification of the Constitution was called the Massachusetts Compromise, because of major opposition to ratification that had existed in Massachusetts.  John Hancock and Samuel Adams (both of them anti-Federalists) were the ones who helped negotiate the compromise. The anti-Federalists agreed that they would support ratification of the Constitution, with the understanding that recommendations for amendments would follow if the Constitution was ratified.  The Federalists promised to support the proposed amendments, which would outline a Bill of Rights to guarantee protection of specific rights the anti-Federalists wanted specifically asserted in the Constitution.  

The US Constitution was ratified in 1788.  The Bill of Rights was created in 1789 and ratified in 1791.

4 0
3 years ago
Don't guess its really important grade! Please Explain!
postnew [5]

Answer:

\C

trust me i have this test to its C im an A student at rodman

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What led to the Emancipation Proclamation?
Studentka2010 [4]
1, 1863, three years into the war. ... Now the war was about ending slavery, which led to the tide changing in favor of the Union under the leadership of Ulysses S. Grant. The Emancipation Proclamation didn't free all slaves, just those living in Confederate states. Hope that helped!!
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did america's founders adopt constitutional democracy as the u.s. political system?
    6·1 answer
  • How did the two compromises reached during the constitutional convention satisfy competing groups?
    12·1 answer
  • The Convention at Seneca Falls, New York in 1848 was convened to petition the right of which group to vote?
    10·1 answer
  • The date a source was created is considered part of its _____
    9·2 answers
  • What was the reason for the Constitutional Convention?
    8·1 answer
  • Someone please help me:(
    7·1 answer
  • Who claims to have a historical right to the land that is now Israel?
    9·1 answer
  • In a short essay explain how the ideology of a totalitarain regime differs from that of a democratic regime
    8·1 answer
  • Help please lol if I fail this I fail
    6·1 answer
  • What was your reaction to the Allotment act of 1887? Do you agree or disagree with the results?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!