Answer:Technology law scholars have recently started to consider the theories of affordance and technological mediation, imported from the fields of psychology, human-computer interaction (HCI), and science and technology studies (STS). These theories have been used both as a means of explaining how the law has developed, and more recently in attempts to cast the law per se as an affordance. This exploratory paper summarises the two theories, before considering these applications from a critical perspective, noting certain deficiencies with respect to potential normative application and definitional clarity, respectively. It then posits that in applying them in the legal context we should seek to retain the relational user-artefact structure around which they were originally conceived, with the law cast as the user of the artefact, from which it seeks certain features or outcomes. This approach is effective for three reasons. Firstly, it acknowledges the power imbalance between law and architecture, where the former is manifestly subject to the decisions, made by designers, which mediate and transform the substance of the legal norms they instantiate in technological artefacts. Secondly, from an analytical perspective, it can help avoid some of the conceptual and definitional problems evident in the nascent legal literature on affordance. Lastly, approaching designers on their own terms can foster better critical evaluation of their activities during the design process, potentially leading to more effective ‘compliance by design’ where the course of the law’s mediation by technological artefacts can be better anticipated and guided by legislators, regulators, and legal practitioners.
Keywords
Affordance, technological mediation, postphenomenology, legal theory, compliance by design, legal design
Answer:
Explanation:
The statements are logically equivalent if they have the same truth tables. So let´s use truth tables in order to determine if they are logically equivalent or not:
The picture that I attached you shows the truth table for each case. As you can see in the highlight columns:
They are logically equivalent because they have exactly the same truth values between each other. Hence, we can conclude that they are logically equivalent.
Solution:
initial = float(eval(input('Enter the monthly saving amount: ')))
x = (1 + 0.00417)
month_one = initial * x
month_two = (initial + month_one) * x
month_three = (initial + month_two) * x
month_four = (initial + month_three) * x
month_five = (initial + month_four) * x
month_six = (initial + month_five) * x
print('The sixth month value is: '+str(month_six))
Don't forget the saving amount, and initialize the balance with that amount. Inside the loop, work out and add the interest and then add the saving amount for the next month.
balance = 801
for month in range(6):
balance = balance * (1.00417)
print(balance)
Answer:
50%
Explanation:
The markup is the difference between the selling price and the cost price. If the mark up is greater than zero, it means there is a profit, if the markup is less than 0, it means there is a loss and if the markup is equal to 0, it means there is breakeven.
Percentage markup = (markup/cost price) * 100%
Selling price - cost price = markup
15 - cost price = 5
cost price = 10
Percentage markup = (markup/cost price) * 100% = (5/10) * 100% = 50%
- The answer is "Option C" because the WMD is a freeware memory test software that works excellently.
- It is a comprehensive math question, and it is also quite straightforward to use.
- They suggest that you first test your ram with Memtest86, but you really should always test a second time with a different memory testing application to be certain.
- Microsoft Windows Diagnostic is the second tool, that scans your laptop's physical memory & identifies any faults.
- It requires a reboot to be used the system that will restart, and you'll be unable to your mouse in the Memory Diagnostic Tool.
The wrong choices can be defined as follows:
- In option a, it is wrong because the data warehouse transforms data into information that may be used by an organization's decision-making process.
- In option b, it is wrong because by using Metrics Collector Groups and logging the data, it was able to display real-time market data as well as collect and store data.
- In option d, it is wrong because this is a tool used in Windows, which displays detailed information about major events that have taken place on your machine.
- In option e, it is wrong because messages and trace logs could be viewed and sorted using the Log Viewer.
Learn more:
Memory Diagnostic: brainly.com/question/13606234
