Answer:
Although many still claim that evidence about year-round school and its link to higher achievement is inconclusive, studies consistently reveal that year-round students score higher on certain assessments than those students who attend schools with traditional nine-month calendars.
Explanation:
All options you were given are the following:
- Although many still claim that evidence about year-round school and its link to higher achievement is inconclusive, studies consistently reveal that year-round students score higher on certain assessments than those students who attend schools with traditional nine-month calendars.
- Although many still claim that evidence about year-round school and its link to higher achievement is inconclusive, this theory is wrong because students in year-round schools consistently score higher on certain assessments than those students who attend schools with traditional nine-month calendars.
- Although many still claim that evidence about year-round school and its link to higher achievement is inconclusive, they would admit defeat if only they would do their research and find that students in year-round schools consistently score higher on certain assessments than those students who attend schools with traditional nine-month calendars.
- Although many still claim that evidence about year-round school and its link to higher achievement is inconclusive, these people need to study their facts and acknowledge that students in year-round schools consistently score higher on certain assessments than those students who attend schools with traditional nine-month calendars.
The first option is the best one because it is completely objective. Objective statements are statements that contain only facts, statements uninfluenced by personal beliefs, emotions, and assumptions. The student uses data from some research, which makes the statement objective. The tone is also appropriate - it's neutral. Other statements lack objectiveness and their tone is not as neutral as it should be.
Answer: et me know if you still need help it's been 2 weeks
Explanation:
If I were to answer this I would say A
Answer:
As travelers fly into the spirit of the saint louis airport, there are greeted by the huge gleaming Gateway Arch facing the west. National landmarks are areas of great beauty giving opportunity for open-air, established so that national beauty can be preserved and enhanced. National landmarks have such positive influences on peoples lives so i think using public money to maintain national landmarks is good. Public money should be spent on keeping up national parks. because they are part of our country's history and something to admire. i think the money should be spent because if we didn't use the the National landmarks will crumble and fall.
Explanation:
it is not 100 words but i hope it helps
