Based on the foundations of federalism, why might health care continue to be a deeply debated issue? The debate is over whether
the issue should be under federal or state control. Politicians argue that no single healthcare program will cover all Americans. The debate is over whether health care should affect tax rates. Medical professionals are opposed to such a generic program.
Health care has always been a highly debated issue for several reasons. The first one is whether it should be controlled by each state or the federal government and the solution to the debate could be that every state were able to control their local health care programs but with a federal agency to supervise it. This takes us to the next issue; Politicians argue that no single healthcare program will cover all Americans. And they have a valid point, but if every state could create and control their local health care programs, it would be easier to reach a wider number of citizens with a health care program. The next issue of the debate is whether those programs should affect tax rates, and of course they would, but only at a local level, not at the federal level. The last point of the debate is that the medical professionals are opposed to such programs. Of course they are against it, nowadays medical attention costs a fortune, and doctors receive great sums of money for their services. There should be a balance in the cost health care, I am not suggesting that it should be free for everybody, only to the most needed ones.
These two researcher obligations, wherein the researchers make sure that the participants are told about the true nature of the study before they leave and they must make sure that the participants do not feel bad about their behavior, are referred to as debriefing and protection from harm.
