One advantage is that if successful, all the money goes to you. If you're a huge company with shareholders, then the people and the investors get some of the money the company makes. In a sole proprietorship, everything goes to you and then you can choose what to do with it.
The correct answer is <span>the amendment receives a two-thirds vote.
The amendment process is difficult because of this since everyone has to agree on it and it doesn't happen often that 2/3 of both houses agree on anything. The two-thirds numbers is called the supermajority.</span>
Answer:
a. of the letters the settlers wrote to relatives back in Spain.
Explanation:
San Antonio de Bexar was a historical fort that was built by the Spanish in what is now present-day San Antonio, Texas, US. This place became one of the earliest places of settlement in which the Spanish people came to enter into the American soil, through the process of assimilation and colonial settlement.
In<u> 1675, an expedition consisting of Fray Juan Larios, Fernando del Bosque, Fray Francisco Hidalgo, and Fray Antonio de Olivares </u>was sent by the Spanish crown to look into the possibility of establishing new settlements. It was through this expedition that led to the discovery of San Antonio. <u>Historians were able to learn about the intention of the explorers about making it a permanent settlement from the letters sent to relatives about the need to send more people to the settlement</u>.
Thus, the correct answer is option a.
Answer:
Heat from the Sun turns water from plants and leaves, as well as oceans, lakes, and rivers, into water vapour or which disappears into the air. This vapour rises, cools, and changes into tiny water droplets, which form clouds. ... When the water droplets get too large and heavy, they fall as rain.
Answer:
C.S. Lewis states that moral law is not a simply convention . He says "there are two reasons for saying it belongs to the same class as mathematics. The first is, as I said in the first chapter, that though there are differences between the moral ideas of one time or country and those of another, the differences are not really very great — not nearly so great as most people imagine — [...].The other reason is this. When you think about these differences between the morality of one people and another, do you think that the morality of one people is ever better or worse than that of another? Have any of the changes been improvements? If not, then of course there could never be any moral progress. Progress means not just changing, but changing for the better. If no set of moral ideas were truer or better than any other, there would be no sense in preferring civilized morality to savage morality, or Christian morality to Nazi morality."
Then the Law of Human Nature is compared as a standard or universal truth: "he moment you say that one set of moral ideas can be better than another, you are, in fact, measuring them both by a standard, saying that one of them conforms to that standard more nearly than the other. But the standard that measures two things is something different from either. You are, in fact, comparing them both with some Real Morality, admitting that there is such a thing as a real Right, independent of what people think, and that some people's ideas get nearer to that real Right than others."
Reference: Lewis, C.S. “Some Objections .” PBS, Public Broadcasting Service, 1952
