Answer:
a) Distinguish between the use of Franchising and Joint Venture as modes of entry into other countries by global businesses.
Franchising consists in the licensing of aspects of production and intellectual property to a another party: the franchise.
A Joint Venture is a business union between two or more parties, in which they split profit as well as costs and responsabilities.
b) What are the respective advantages and disadvantages of both strategies?
Franchising can be a quicker way to expand into foreign markets. The flexibility of the method, and the lower capital requirements are the reason why. This can be seen in the success that American fast-food brands have had using this method to expand in global markets.
A Joint-Venture can be more difficult to use for market expansion, however, it can be more profitable, because the profit will not be split among as many parties as in franchising, and more importantly, the firm maintains a higher control of the operation.
Answer:
The answers are:
- The CPI for 2009 is 100 (since it is the base year)
- The CPI for 2010 is 129.17
- The inflation rate for 2010 is 29.17%
Explanation:
<u>CPI basket for 2009</u>
- 6 razors x $20 per razor = $120
- 4 bottles of cologne x $30 per bottle = $120
The total value of the CPI basket for 2009 is $240
<u>CPI basket for 2010</u>
- 6 razors x $25 per razor = $150
- 4 bottles of cologne x $40 per bottle = $160
The total value of the CPI basket for 2010 is $310
- The CPI for 2009 is 100, since it is the base year
- The CPI for 2010 = (CPI basket 2010 / CPI basket 2009) x 100 = ($310 / $240) x 100 = 129.17
- The inflation rate for 2010 = [(CPI basket 2010 / CPI basket 2009) - 1] x 100 = (1.2917 - 1) x 100% = 29.17%
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Explanation
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
Answer:
The correct option is (d)
Explanation:
Ethics is considered above law as law requires just compliance of laws, rules and regulations. Ethics on the other hand establishes a standard of moral conduct. Being mere legal does not mean that something is ethical. Ethical responsibilities are not codified as it is expected from businesses to follow the same.
Here, Marshall, though complied with legal frameworks, he failed to fulfill his ethical obligations by using low-grade products that could harm the general public in future.
