Answer:
While the government of Carolina already a constitution, originally made on the 1st March of 1669. However, this was soon ratified firstly in 1682 and then later in 1698.
Explanation:
The original Constitution was built by Carolina's proprietors,who worked with the governor to ensure that a set of laws could be followed.
However, it was in 1682 that over 3 revisions of the constitution took place. It was the same year in which an affluent class of English men, took over the political and economic control of the colony.
Eventually, they concentrated their efforts in Charleston, taking over native land and building large plantations.
Answer:
Because of our transportation systems, producers and service providers in GA can buy their materials from all over the country AND the world which puts Georgians at an advantage over people in other areas of the country who don't have railroads, ports, numerous interstates, and an INTERNATIONAL airport
The senate rejected Robert Bork
Answer: He believed private entrepreneurs could stabilize their industries and promote efficiency in production and marketing.
Explanation:
Answer:
The decision in Scott v. Sandford was received with joy and relief in the south, because much of the region's society owned slaves; while in the north it caused much disgust and annoyance among abolitionists.
Explanation:
Dred Scott was born in slavery around 1799 in Virginia. He moved with his master, Peter Blow, to Missouri in 1830. After Blow died two years later, military surgeon John Emerson Scott bought and brought him to Illinois and then to a town in Wisconsin, places where slaves were prohibited by law.
After Emersons death, Scott tried to buy his freedom and his family's from Emerson's widow, Irene, but she did not accept his offer. Scott, therefore, in 1850, decided to go to trial and demand his liberty in view of the fact that he had lived for eight years in counties where slavery was illegal and received no legal recognition. Henry Taylor Blow, son of Peters Blow and Scott's childhood friend, funded the couple's lawsuit and provided legal advice to them in litigation. After three appeals, the lawsuit was submitted to the Supreme Court in 1857.
On March 6, the Supreme Court ruled against Scott by seven votes against two. The court's finding was that neither Scott nor other African Americans were considered citizens, and therefore Scott was not entitled to litigate for US law. Furthermore, the Supreme Court denied that Scott had been freed by living in Missouri because the Constitution required the government not to deprive anyone of its legal property without litigation. Thus, in fact, all laws that prohibited or restricted slavery in the United States were contrary to the Constitution.
