Answer:
Over the weekend, I was shocked to hear that my next door neighbour, who has three adorable children, lost her husband in a freak accident.
As someone who is a parent and has also experienced loss, I empathized with her and was relieved to hear that she had security against the loss of her husband's income.
But not everybody is so lucky.
Did you know that in America over 58% of families would not be able to cover their monthly expenses just a few months after a loved one passed away?
It is often only those life-changing events like the death of a loved one – or the birth of a little one – that cause people to think about their own mortality. People tend to think that what is unlikely to happen will not, and as a result, they expose their family to the hit of a lost income forever.
Explanation:
The consequence is that most people have what we at Swiss Re call a "protection gap" – the term used to describe the difference between the financial means one has and one needs – and it primarily affects the middle classes (those earning between $30,000 and $120,000 per annum). This gap has taken on gigantic proportions. In the US alone, the population mortality protection gap stands at USD 21 trillion, which works out to approximately 400k USD per household. In Europe, the figure is almost as large (USD 17 trillion).
The protection gap exists because people lack awareness about both the gap itself and ways to rectify it.
Answer:
Conclusion: "Therefore, all jeans at the nearby store are on sale."
Explanation:
Reasoning- this happens when a person thinks about something logically. This process of thinking affects the decision of a person. There are primarily two type of reasoning: <em>inductive and deductive.</em>
Inductive Reasoning- this reasoning starts with specific observations that move into generalized conclusion.
Deductive Reasoning- this is the opposite of inductive reasoning. It starts with a generalized statement and moves to a specific conclusion.
The example above demonstrates inductive reasoning.
Jeans are on sale at a nearby store. = this is the specific observation that you have.
Therefore, all jeans at the nearby store are on sale = this is the generalized conclusion. Since jeans are on sale at a nearby store, then you assume that all jeans are on sale at a nearby store. For you, this is true.
Remember that not all conclusions are valid. They are only true according to how you reasoned out.
<span>Belshazzar ruled Babylon, an intense country with a long history and a long queue of capable lords. One of those lords was Nebuchadnezzar, who had vanquished Judah, conveying the sanctuary fortunes to Babylon alongside Daniel and numerous different hostages. Belshazzar was Nebuchadnezzar's grandson through his little girl Nitocris. Belshazzar calls Nebuchadnezzar his "dad", however, this is a non-exclusive utilization of the word father, signifying "precursor."</span>
The answer is D a person who put is on a positive performance under pressure
Answer:
The infinite phrase is choice A: "to return the sweater".
Explanation:
An infinite phrase is described as a verb plus modifying words. "Return" is a verb, and "to" is a modifying word. "To return" is the infinite phrase.
