It’s number 2 selling goods over luxury items
1. Yes. Unfortunately, the role that this privilege plays in society is often to encourage inequality among citizens and not to allow meritocracy to be exercised efficiently.
2. No. The USA promotes and foresees an unequal treatment among citizens, mainly regarding race, origin, social position and heredity of people, which ends up generating a strong social inequality.
3. The US government protects citizens' rights through laws and guidelines that must be followed across the country. However, often these laws only work in theory and people continue to have their rights unprotected, especially citizens who are members of a social minority.
4. No. When our government was created, there was a strong slave culture in the country, which affirmed that whites and blacks were different and should be treated in different ways, where whites were placed as superiors and deserving of all possible social privilege. Furthermore, at the beginning of our government, women were also considered inferior and lived under a system of domination to which men were not subjected.
5. This did not impact the decision of the creators of our government, since they were all white men and did not suffer from the lack of rights and privileges that women and blacks suffered.
Answer:
A.was more exlusive than the american Federation of Labor. I hope this works.
<span>Two methods would be paying workers low wages and paying lower prices for raw material</span>
The answer is <u>David Lloyd George.</u>
The mentioned conference was the Versailles Peace Conference that took place in 1919, after the world war I. It set the peace terms for vanquished Germany.
David Lloyd George, a Prime Minister of Britain, was one of the three great statesmen at the Conference. He found himself in the middle, between an American President who proposed peaceful negotiations to a long-lasting peace in Europe, that included not only to go easier on Germany but also conditions for all countries involved (Disarmament, free trade, freedom of the seas, open diplomacy, etc) and the Prime Minister of France, who wanted a ruthless revenge and to weaken Germany so it'd never be able to invade another country again.
George's personal view was to make justice, but not revenge, to impose some reparations on Germany, but not be too harsh on them to the point that it ruined their economy since eventually, Europe would have to reconcile with Germany and ruining its economy would affect others nation's economies as well. He was also concerned that the Communist of the Russian Revolution of 1917 would spread west, so the treaty should leave Germany strong enough to stop them.
He tried his best to persuade the other leaders on this, but others British politicians wanted harsh reparations as well.
Though the treaty resulting was certainly harsh on Germany, it is believed that it could've been worse if George hasn't had tried to get to a halfway point between U.S. and France.
