Answer:
The $12,000 dividend declaration is made during its recent year of operation
Explanation:
In this question, we have to apply the formula which is shown below:
The ending balance of retained earning = Beginning balance of retained earnings + net income - dividend paid
$80,000 = $65,000 + $27,000 - dividend paid
$80,000 = $92,000 - dividend paid
So, the dividend paid equals to
= $92,000 - $80,000
= $12,000
These items would be displayed in the retained earnings statement
Answer:
Annual deposit= $37,714.37
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
The villa costs $500,000 today, and housing prices in Mexico are expected to increase by 6% per year. Manny and Irene want to make fifteen equal annual payments into an account, starting today, so there will be enough money to purchase the villa in fifteen years.
The account earns 10% per year.
First, we need to calculate the final value of the house with the following formula.
FV= PV*(1+i)^n
FV= 500,000*(1.06^15)=$1,198,279.1
Now, we can calculate the annual payments required:
FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
A= annual deposit
Isolating A:
A= (FV*i)/{[(1+i)^n]-1}
A= (1,198,279.1*0.10)/[(1.10^15)-1]
A= $37,714.37
Answer:
E) Trademark Dilution Act
Explanation:
The Trademark Dilution Act was passed by Congress in 1995 and it's sole purpose is to protect famous trademarks from similar imitations or copycats.
Long before this law was passed, famous trademarks like Coke had to sue imitators that tried to use similar names to market "alternative" products. For example, in 1920 Coca Cola (owner of Coke) sued Koke for trademark infringement and won.
The Trademark Dilution Act prohibits using trademarks and logos that are similar to famous trademarks because it dilutes their reputation and goodwill.
This will likely deter people from accumulating wealth in future.
Answer: Option 3.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Taxes are the amount of money that the citizens have to pay to the government. It is obligatory in nature. And in return to these taxes, the government will provide services to the citizens of the country.
But since the citizens have to pay to the government from their own personal income, so it pinches the citizens. An additional tax on the wealth of the citizens will deter the people to save and accumulate the wealth in future and will not motivate them.