Answer:
Yes. Under the doctrine of equitable estoppel, when a person relies on an owner's oral promise to sell real property and then changes his or her position substantially, the owner is bound by the oral promise.
Answer:
Explanation:
United States Supreme Court case which held that installing a Global Positioning System tracking device on a vehicle and using the device to monitor the vehicle's movements constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment.
Answer:
If the court applies the Stare decisis doctrine, the case will not be dismissed.
Explanation:
The stare decisis doctrine will provide the necessary legal bases for the case to proceed within California. This will happen because there is a legal decision applied throughout the national territory that states that this type of clause, which presents a selection forum, is inexorable. This happens because the AOL clause violated, in fact, a very strong public policy, so the judges are obliged to continue with the case, within the state where the public policy was violated.
Answer:
Fair Credit Reporting Act.
Explanation:
It makes sure you have many ways to dispute incorrect information on your credit report.
The motion that the Barge Company's attorney should make is that the Longshoreman Act does not apply to Lonnie since he did not sustain any injury while working.
<h3>What is the Longshoreman Act?</h3>
The Longshoreman Act is a federal law that compensates harbor workers and provides certain benefits when they suffer injuries in accidents.
Some of the benefits under the Longshoreman Act include coverage for:
- Lost income
- Medical care
- Vocational rehabilitation.
Thus, the motion that the Barge Company's attorney should make is that the Longshoreman Act does not apply to Lonnie since he did not sustain any injury while working.
Learn more about making motions in court at brainly.com/question/13054707
#SPJ1
