1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dima020 [189]
3 years ago
8

What conditions were found on slave ships

History
2 answers:
Artyom0805 [142]3 years ago
5 0
If you are thinking of the ships from Africa, the ships conditions were horrible, there was a lot of deaths on the ships with the slaves, it was rare to have the ships with slaves to have 80%+
ivolga24 [154]3 years ago
4 0
Slaves were  overcrowding the ships, becuz more slaves mean more money
Poor conditions because of little water and food
They were treated poorly on the boats
You might be interested in
Your textbook defines a southern planter as an individual who owned at least __________________ slaves.
GaryK [48]
A southern planter referred to an individual who owned at least 20 slaves during the Plantation Era (Antebellum era) in the (Southern) United States from late 18th century until 1861, which was the start of the American Civil War. 

Planters referred to the people who owned plantations during the Antebellum Era. Most of the planters comprised the elite class of the South and differed from the farmers in that they were more like businessmen and did not work alongside their slaves on the fields. 
4 0
3 years ago
Which protection is provided today by the civil rights act of 1964 as a result of later provisions answers?
sasho [114]

While initially, the civil rights act of 1964 gave legal protection from discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Later amendments to the act (made in 1957 and 1960) extended the protection to disabled Americans, women in collegiate athletics and the elderly.

7 0
4 years ago
What did the day that Martin Luther King Jr. gave his I have a dream look like?
Helen [10]

Answer:

Martin luther king sstepped up and in a firm voice said "I have a dream that one day my children will live in a world where they will not be judged by the color of there skin but by the content of there character". People screammed and yelled horray horray.

Explanation:

Hope this helped good luck

3 0
3 years ago
In your opinion, which of the two makes the more powerful appeal to emotions? Explain your answers in a short essay.
iris [78.8K]

Answer:

An emotional appeal is used to sway the emotions of an audience to lead them to support the .... a few examples of “pathos” charged words consist of: strong, powerful, tragic, equality, ..

An emotional appeal is a way of persuasion that's designed to create an emotional reaction. Emotion (also referred to as pathos or suffering in Greek) is one of the three modes of persuasion identified by Aristotle. the other two are trademarks, or logic, and ethos, or authority.

appeal to emotion or argumentative ad passions is a logical fallacy characterized through the manipulation of the recipient's emotions for you to win an argument, particularly in the absence of factual evidence

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
HELPPP
adell [148]

The most striking parallel between what each historian claims about the Mongols' influence on surrounding societies is that they almost wiped them out during an initial conquest or as reprisal for revolt.

<h3>What exactly are the Mongols?</h3>

The Mongols are a Central Asian ethnographic community of tribal peoples that live mostly on the Mongolian Plateau, speak a similar language, and have nomadic lives.

<h3>What is the most significant distinction between what each historian claims about the Mongols' influence on surrounding civilizations?</h3>

The key difference in how they describe the impact of the Mongols on the surrounding civilization is that the first writer focuses on the benefits of the Mongols after they conquered neighboring civilizations, whereas the second author concludes their description with a picture of a barbaric and brutal Mongolian dynasty.

<h3>What is one historical circumstance that might explain for the two historians' opposing viewpoints?</h3>

It is possible to conclude that the one element that accounts for the disparities in their perspectives is the individual who was at the helm of government during the times described.

The first author tells the story only from the historian's perspective of Genghis Khan, but the latter also covers Tamerlane's rule.

Learn more about the Mongols at:

brainly.com/question/17835217

#SPJ1

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How many people may have lived in Cahokia? 1,000 4,000 40,000 15,000
    10·1 answer
  • 1.
    5·2 answers
  • How much did al gore win the popular vote by?
    12·1 answer
  • Why was the collapse of slavery different in new england versus the middle states?
    13·1 answer
  • Which other European counties explored and settled in the America’s
    14·1 answer
  • Which woman contributed to founding the American Red Cross?
    7·2 answers
  • __________ is defined as a gathering of people, often for a specific purpose.
    14·2 answers
  • What is one thing every U.S person must do
    10·1 answer
  • How were the Hohokam of North America and the ancient Mesopotamians alike?
    7·1 answer
  • How successful were the British in expanding their control over Indian
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!