The correct answer would be: dependence on nonrenewable resources.
A nonrenewable resources are resources that cannot be readily replaced by natural means, such as fossil fuels (oil, natural gas). The use of these resources is not sustainable because their formation takes billions of years. The whole world is dependent on these non-renewable sources but they are becoming more scarce daily.
Answer: Here you go!
Explanation:
Doubling the amount of grass would definitely increase the rabbit population since there is more food/resources for it to produce. Since the food chain has a domino effect everything else would go up as well because of the increase of food/resources that will help sustain the population of all. so for the first line it would be increase for rabbit snake and hawk. Halving the amount of grass would effect the population of all animals as well. But in a more negative way. It would decrease because the rabbits wouldn't have enough food to produce and thrive. With the decline of rabbits less snakes will live because of the low amount of their main food source. Same with the eagles. So therefore it would be decrease in all the bottom lines.
Plants use Photosynthesis for food and nutrients and produce oxygen in the progress
The answer is the option A. removing plants from hillsides eliminates the root structures that anchor soil. Indeed the roots of trees, further to anchor the tress to the floor, serve as a net to which the soil attaches preventing the soil of been washed and removed by rainstorms
