Options two refers to the author being a teenager himself so he would be reliable for this info because it is firsthand.
Answer:
if no one tried to think critically, then everyone would be in a tizzy. critical thinking is logical and comes from an analytical perspective, and if this form of thought was gone, we would be left with emotional thinking. with emotional thinking, people will act on how they feel, rather than a logical explanation. the world would go crazy and be a mess of emotional beings who let their feelings get in the way of logic.
Explanation:
~~~ Imagination = ego = vanity!
<span>It is there that desire and will exist!</span>
Answer:
A number of different theoretical approaches to explaining prejudice dominated social scientific inquiry at different stages during the twentieth century with each having distinctive social policy implications. These different approaches seemed to emerge in response to specific historical circumstances that made particular questions about the nature or causation of prejudice salient for social scientists. The study of prejudice has therefore provided an interesting case study in how values and social milieu interact with and influence social scientific concepts and explanations.
Read more: Prejudice - Conclusion - Social, Edited, Psychology, and John - JRank Articles https://science.jrank.org/pages/10841/Prejudice-Conclusion.html#ixzz7Aew16MYo
Explanation:
B. Traverse
Normally, a speaker would use the word "move" as in "move forward" instead of "traverse forward"
