The option that makes the most sense for the party by Mr and Mrs Atoll is one case of 24 sodas at $18.50.
<h3>Why this option is the cheapest</h3>
The reason for this is that given the guests they are entertaining, this option is the most cheapest and effective.
How to calculate for the way that the drink would go round
a. Each bottle is $1.5. Two bottles for 1 = 1.5x2 = 3 dollars
b. six packs at 5$. One= $0.88
c. A case of 24 sodas at $18.5. one soda is going to be 18.5/24 = $0.77
d. Two cases of 24 soda at 18.5 = $1.54
Given the calculations that have been done above, option c at $0.77 is the cheapest. It would require them to send the less money in getting sodas that would go round twice for 10 people.
Read more on the economy here: brainly.com/question/1106682
Answer:
9 kanban
Explanation:
The calculation of the number of kanban containers needed is given below:
= (Lead time demand + Safety stock) ÷ kanban size
where,
Lead time demand is
= 1,500 radios × 1 days
= 1,500 radios
Container size = 250 radios
Safety Stock is
= 1 ÷ 2 day × 1,500 radios
= 750 radios
So, the number of kanban containers needed is
= (1,500 radios + 750 radios) ÷ (250 radios)
= 9 kanban
We simply used the above formula to find out the required kanbans
Answer:
False
Explanation:
A lagged effect in marketing can be defined as the delay that comes from an effort put into marketing a product.
In marketing, efforts put into an advertisement can yield a greater result even after the lag period. This means that a product might need more than one advertisement and the combined effects of the advertisements will be seen overtime if not immediately.
In the above question, Joel still went on to get a Ford fusion after seeing the Toyota advert which means that something from his research must have influenced his decision. Either price, quality, or any other factors must have been responsible for Joel's choice but it is definitely not the lagged effect.
Cheers.
Answer:
The total monthly payments that are deductible by Duron are:
$1,200 each month for the next 10 years.
Explanation:
According to the IRS rules, if Duron pays his ex partner payments each month which are not documented by the court, the money is not tax deductible. Therefore, it is beneficial for Duron to receive a court order to pay the additional alimony if Duron plans on enjoying a tax deduction for the additional spousal support of $200.
Wendy’s pretzel burger ad made me hungry and wanted to buy burger
