Direct evidence does not require any reasoning or inference to arrive at the conclusion to be drawn from the evidence.
Example: If a person testified that he or she looked outside a window and saw rain falling, that is direct evidence that it rained.
Indirect evidence, requires that an inference be made between the evidence and the conclusion to be drawn from it.
Example: If, on the other hand, a witness testified that he or she heard distant pitter patter, and later walked outside and saw that the ground was wet, smelled freshness in the air and felt that the air was moist, those sensations would be indirect evidence that it had rained.
Answer:
The persuasive writing style.
Explanation:
Which writing style problem is most apparent (obvious) in Statement 1?
- Take a look at Statement 1:
"Please come to the meeting with some out-of-the-box ideas that really push the envelope"
- Recall the types of writing style:
1. Expository 2. Descriptive 3. Persuasive 4. Narrative
ANSWER:
The whole question is a note (probably from the head of sales team) to members of the sales team in an organization. The writer is exposing them to the purpose of the meeting or topics of discussion for the meeting (expository writing).
The writer is also persuading the team members to brainstorm before coming for the meeting; so as to make important contributions.
In Statement 1, the persuasion of the writer seems more like coercion. The writer is persuasive but stern about the level or quality of ideas he wants to get at the meeting.
The writing style problem that is most apparent in Statement 1 hence, is the persuasive writing style.
Answer and explanation:
This is the context in which the word "telerobbery" appears in the story:
<em>Nothing changes on its face or anything, but I get a pretty bad feeling right then. I mean, an even worse feeling. And, sure enough, I hear the servos in the thing’s arm start to grind. Now it turns and swings me to the left, smashing the side of my head into the door of the pie fridge hard enough to crack the glass. The whole right side of my head feels cold and then warm. Then the side of my face and neck and arm all start to feel really warm, too. Blood’s shooting out of me like a [...] fire hydrant.
</em>
<em>Jesus, I’m crying. And that’s when… uh. That’s when Felipe shows up.
</em>
<em>Do you give the domestic robot money from the register?
</em>
<em>What? It doesn’t ask for money. It never asked for money. It doesn’t say a word. What went down wasn’t a telerobbery, man. I don’t even know if it was being remote controlled, Officer …
</em>
<em>What do you think it wants?
</em>
<em>It wants to kill me. That’s all.</em>
<em />
From this passage, we can understand a man has been attacked by his robot. The officer who is asking the questions to understand the reasons for the attack asks if the robot wanted money. The man then answers that what took place was not a telerobbery, that he doesn't even know if the robot was being remote controlled. <u>From those clues, we can safely assume telerobbery is a robbery performed by a robot that is being controlled by someone or something that is not present.</u>
A plot of a novel is an artificial ordering of events. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option or option "C". It is actually nothing but a fictitious prose narrative. I hope that this is the answer you were looking for and it has come to your help.
Answer:
d
Explanation:
run up deep we keep the ghost in the glocc
luigis mantion, B1tches dancin
we keep the phantom at the top
