Answer:
Emperor Jahangir’s point of view concerning English merchants in the Mughal Empire:
The Emperor viewed the English merchants as the subjects of King James I.
Below is an excerpt from Document 1 which supports that:
"...merchants of the English nation as the subjects of my friend".
Explanation:
The Emperor stated that the King was his friend and he gave commandment that his kingdom should receive every English merchant. This was as a result of his friendship and love for the King. He gave the merchants free liberty to live anywhere they like in his kingdom without being disturbed.
Political parties express the public's complaints to the government while opposing it. They educate the populace on how the ruling parties operate. Therefore, political parties serve as a conduit between the populace and the executive branch. They establish a government and control it.
An organized collection of individuals with the desire to create a government is referred to as a political party. They run candidates for office and have the same philosophy and political views. They establish their objectives and promote them. Political parties are significant because they offer a wide range of candidate options during elections. Since there are no political parties and all elected officials are independent, no one will make any significant policy promises. Each autonomous delegate will carry out their own agenda, leading to chaos throughout the nation.
Learn more about the model of democracy:
brainly.com/question/27759385
#SPJ4
Answer:
Ano ang ibig mong sabihin dito?
The Zaque dynasty replaced the Aksum.
The general conclusion from the books and stories and in very
rare real life incidents on feral children and those brought up in confinement
is that individuals don't wind up plainly human, or at least completely human,
unless they can interface with other individuals, particularly at an early age.
The idea of feral children connects with the central issue of the connection
amongst "nature" and "nurture." The nature side argues that
it is a built in nature of any human being to become the kind of person he is
supposed to be while the Nurture side argues that it is the interaction, people
teaching us and environment etc. which makes a personality. In the case of
feral children the argument weighs more in “Nurture”<span> side that nurture plays more role in determining
the personality of a person than nature. </span>
