A. They wanted to increase support for ratification of the Constitution
The Federalists were those who had helped create the Constitution after the Articles of Confederation failed, or they supported the Constitution. In order for the Constitution to speak for the people, each state had to ratify it. Anti-Federalists believed that it gave the government too much power and published essays against ratifying it. The Federalist papers were in response.
Answer:
Journal Entry:
Supporters of the Jersey Plan mostly come from the larger states like New York or New Jersey. They believe that the seats of Congress should be distributed according to the states population. This plan clearly benefits the larger states.
Supporters of the Virginia Plan mostly come from the smaller states and the South. They feel that the seats of Congress should be distributed equally among the states, regardless of population size. This plan clearly benefits the least populated states.
A compromise should be reached that benefits both sides. Perhaps a bicameral Congress with one chamber benefiting the most populated states, and the other chamber benefiting the least populated states.
Answer:
I dont know if this is right because the question didn't make sense so hope this helps! :
On May 18, 1896, the U.S. Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson ruled that separate-but-equal facilities were constitutional. The Plessy v. Ferguson decision upheld the principle of racial segregation over the next half-century
Explanation:
This is an example of <span>Equal Pay and Compensation Discrimination. This is under the Equal Pay Act which requires that men and women who have exactly the same type of work be given equal salaries. This does not only include the salary, but also includes benefits, bonuses, overtime pay, etc. </span>