The fascist party leader who became dictator of Italy was named "Mussolini" and was the leader of Italy during World War II. Italy during this time was allied with Germany and Japan.
Answer: similarly to Lafayette or Mirabeau, Louis XVI believed in moderate way of doing this revolution. Neither Lafayette nor Mirabeau were republicans. Louis XVI was not republican. In contrast to Mirabeau or Lafayette Louis XVI was forced to call for General States (1789) because of problems with state budget (minister of finances Jacques Necker made him to make his made about it, there was no other way). Louis XVI was no republican
Explanation: Louis XVI has no free will already in 1789. He was also under the influence of much more radical right: 1) his wife Marie Antoinette (from Austrian dynasty of Habsburg), 2) his brothers : Louis de Provence, Charles d´Artois, 3) emigration (aristocracy that already during 1789, 1790 escaped to Rhineland, especially to Koblenz). When he tried to escape, he was caught with all his family in Varennes, and then executed (January 1793).
The correct answer is C) the federal government could not force a state governor to return a fugitive.
Until 1987, in cases of extradition, the federal government could not force a state governor to return a fugitive.
For extradition, we understand the faculty that the government of the United States has to surrender a fugitive to other country or state because it has to face criminal charges.
With the Supreme Case of "Kentucky vs. Dennison" in 1860, the federal court did not have the authority to demand the return of a fugitive to another state. This changed in 1987 with the resolution of the case "Puerto Rico v. Brandstand," that overruled the "Kentucky vs. Dennison" case.
The White settlers tried to trade with them, and made alliances and treaties, including them using only limited amounts of land
hope this helps
The correct answer is C. As a result of political stability in Argentina during the late 1800s, foreign investments increased and the economy growth.
The investments, coming mainly from the Argentine State and the United Kingdom, were destined to areas such as railway development, ports and cool stores. Much of immigration and modern economic activities moved away from the interior of the country, boosting the concentration of development and wealth in the city of Buenos Aires; which became a prosperous and cosmopolitan city.
