Answer:
innovation
Explanation:
Technology is defined as human innovation in action that involves the generation of knowledge and processes to develop systems that solve problems and extend human capabilities.
To innovate is to make changes in something established, especially by introducing new methods, ideas, or products.
Answer and Explanation:
This is an example of corporation. Corporation is a legal entity wherein it goes public and offers its shares for ownership and trading in the primary and secondary market. Corporation is public limited company and has a board consisting of executives and CEO. Whereas, the shareholders do not interfere with the management decisions they are only concerned with their dividends.
In this case, Juan owned 1000 shares of DDX. DDX is a corporation because it is able to offers its shares to the general public and allows trading of shares for ownership.
Answer:
a-1. How long do you have to pay before the account is overdue?
a-2. If you take the full period, how much should you remit?
- if you pay after the discount period (first 30 days) but before the 50th day, you must pay $84,800
b-1. What is the discount being offered?
- 2% if you pay within 30 days
b-2. How quickly must you pay to get the discount?
- you have up to 30 days to pay the invoice and still get the discount
b-3. If you do take the discount, how much should you remit?
c-1. If you don’t take the discount, how much interest are you paying implicitly?
c-2. How many days’ credit are you receiving?
- the total credit period is 50 days
Answer:
The correct answer is B: The investment has a future value of $8,053
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
A lump sum of $5,000 is invested at 10% per year for five years. The company's cost of capital is 8%.
We need to calculate the final value of the investment. We will use the following formula:
FV= PV*(1+i)^n
FV= 5,000*1.10^5= $8,052.55
Answer:
Court ruled over in favor of the plaintiffs.
Explanation:
The result was that the court ruled in the favor of the plaintiffs because the contractor was statutorily barred from bringing an action to enforce payment because he doesn't has the residential home builder license and the amount of the contract satisfied statutory requirements.
