They saw $$$$$$$ thats all america cares about.
I think but if its not good Sorry
Federalists were the first political party of the United States and debated the inclusion of the Bill of Rights. There were two sides to the debate: the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists sought to ratify the Constitution while the Anti-Federalists did not. The Federalists felt that the inclusion of the Bill of Rights was not necessary and the Anti- Federalists claimed the Constitution gave the central government too much power, and without a Bill of Rights the people would be at risk of oppression. Yet remarkably, it was The Federalist, James Madison who eventually presented the Bill of Rights to the Congress despite his former opposition.
No. An anthropologist would study culture. The correct answer would be C. Archaeologists because they are the ones that dig up and study artifacts like tools.
Answer:
In the modern era, there are many regulations put in place by the United Nations, as well as widespread social beliefs that the power of a country’s government should not be held entirely by one person. This method of government, known as absolutism, became increasingly common in Europe during the late 1500’s and throughout the 1600’s. In countries such as France, Spain, and England, royal kings held all of the power. A very small percentage of the population owned most of the wealth, with much of the population struggling to get by. In a 1639 excerpt from his writing, King Louis XIV of France compares himself to a god, stating that “And kings are the lieutenants and gods of the people, whose divine right it is to rule.” When one king is given unlimited power over a nation’s government, military, and leadership, the people have no say, and the ruler ends up leading their nation using corrupt ways only beneficial to the upper class and himself. Thankfully, society has changed, and in most countries, the people have some sort of say over their own government and leaders.
Hope this helps! :)
