The narrator stated that he “had no intention of shooting the elephant” because he “had merely sent for the rifle to defend” himself in necessary
Answer:
Metaphor
Explanation:
Makes a comparison without using "like" or "as." Hope this helps!!
Analyze different parts of the creed and write why & how these could effect you in your daily life/ as a cadet. This would probably be the easiest way to write this.
The correct answer is Machiavelli “The Prince” evoked so much discussion and controversy for the following reason.
In “The Prince” Machiavelli shares many political principles that created controversy at the time, but even today are of great influence on some politicians around the globe. Among the controversial ideas he stated, we find:
“The end justifies the means”. This is interpreted as one individual can make any decision or do something to accomplish the result he wants. It doesn’t matter if he messes with other peoples ideas or steps over other people´s principles.
“For a Prince, it is better to be feared than to be loved”. This idea created controversy because it invites the ruler to establish the kind of government that provokes fear instead of respect or love. Machiavelli considered that if people loved the ruler, it could appear as weak. But if the ruler was strong and provoked fear, the consequences would be the control of its people.
“The Prince should act virtuously, but should not avoid acting with cruelty if employing it would benefit the State”. This also created great controversy. It is common sense to believe that the ruler must be correct and respectful. But Machiavelli considered that the opposite, when needed and in favor of the State, was possible and convenient for the Prince.
“People admire generosity, honor, and courage in others, but most of them do not exhibit those values themselves”. Machiavelli understood that people are aware a support moral values in others but it is difficult for them to exemplify those values with its own behaviors.
In order to complete the dialogues between Connie and John and between Erica and Manuel, we must take the context into consideration.
The answers to the first dialogue are:
- Yeah, right! One year is long?
The answer to the second dialogue are:
- That’s good. Now what should we do?
- I think I’m going to make the chicken salad
<h3>What is a dialogue?</h3>
A dialogue is a conversation that takes place between two or more people. For this question, we must choose among the answer choices provided which ones best fit the blanks, so that the dialogues make sense.
In order to choose the best answers, we must take the context of each dialogue into consideration. That means we must read the whole dialogue to find clues as to what is going on:
- In the first dialogue, John clearly does not think Connie should buy a new parka. She thinks it is absurd to wear something from last year, but he does not.
- In the second dialogue, Manuel clearly says something that leads Erica to talk about the menus. He also mentions chicken all of a sudden, which means Erica must say something related to chicken as well.
With the information above in mind, we can conclude that the correct answers to complete the dialogues are the following:
- What’s on your mind? (first dialogue)
- Yeah, right! One year is long? (first dialogue)
- That’s good. Now what should we do? (second dialogue)
- I think I’m going to make the chicken salad (second dialogue)
Learn more about completing dialogues here:
brainly.com/question/13307090
#SPJ1
