<h2>B) Sign of the cross</h2><h2>i.e. In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.</h2><h3> Stay safe, stay healthy</h3><h3> and blessed</h3><h2>Have a blessed day !</h2><h3>Thank you</h3>
Answer:
Explanation:
Against:
Ruled Absolutely- The Enlightment believed in democracy.
Crowned himself emperor- Same reason as above. The Enlightment era brought about many start up revolutions driven by democracy.
Restricted Press- As with America, the freedom of the press was a big deal.
Supported:
Built Schools and Universites- Many new schools came out of the Enlightment period.
Protected Private Property- As with America, property was seen as a right, for better or worse.
Wrote laws garrunteeing Civl Rights- this is self-explaintory
Leading the struggle against apartheid
Answer:
Practically the entirety of the cases that the Supreme Court hears are cases that are on allure. The Supreme Court has unique purview over a not many cases, however these are very uncommon. This implies that the Supreme Court is quite often hearing situations where just matters of law are at issue (instead of issues of certainty). The Supreme Court is essentially, in those cases, attempting to choose if the law (regardless of whether rule law or the Constitution) has been effectively applied.
Explanation:
Cases heard by the Supreme Court for the most part include significant and troublesome issues of law. Cases that are not significant, or where the law is self evident, don't make it as far as possible up the stepping stool to the Supreme Court.
Thus, the cases the Court hears are those that include significant and troublesome inquiries of law. It hears those cases either after they have come up through the government court framework or after they have been chosen by the high court of a state.
Accessory before the act, implies a plan conspiracy