Answer:
Winston v. Lee, 470 U.S. 753, 105 S. Ct. 164 (1985)
Explanation:
A man, who was a robbery suspected said to be armed with a gun was shot by a shop owner when he tried to rob his store. The bullet from the gunshots got into the chest of the suspect and there was an attempt by the commonwealth to get a doctor to surgically remove the bullet from the body of the suspect.
The commonwealth could not establish that it would be fitting under the fourth amendment terms to seek crime evidence of this category by simply requesting for surgery.
The court ordered the surgery to be conducted but the results of the x-rays before the scheduled procedure showed that the bullets went much deeper than expected and the risks were higher than anticipated.
Answer:
staffing, development, compensation, safety and health, and employee and labor relations.
Answer:
settled a debate over representation in Congress.
Explanation:
Answer:
double-barreled question
Explanation:
A double-barreled question is a question that comprises two or more topics or issues , but is expected to have just one answer. A double barreled question is sometimes referred to as an informal fallacy. It also be called a double-direct question or compound question. It is usually advisable to avoid such questions in survey, but can be used in court during cross examination or other researches.
For example the question above touches on two separate issues: the use of reinforcement and the use of punishment at the same time, by parents, as a means to increase the likelihood of desirable behaviors in their children. Stacy found it difficult to answer this question because it is a double-barreled question.
- Dr. Dunn studies the way that children of different ages organize information in their memory. His research focus is primarily on <u>cognitive</u> development.
